[Solved] Education I need help with homework

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

need help with homework – ## Powerpointhomeworkneedshelp.docx **## Powerpointhomeworkneedshelp.docx** This program of study leads to becoming a certified professional educator. It is important to understand the professional certification requirements in your state as well as the continuing education requirements to maintain your certification. Education is constantly changing so educators must be prepared to adapt and grow as the profession evolves. Setting professional goals and developing a plan to meet your goals is crucial to support professional growth and being a lifelong learner. **Part 1: Professional Growth Plan Presentation** Create an 8-12 slide digital presentation that can be used to present your plan for professional growth as an educator. Include the following information in your presentation: · A brief description of the graduate courses and degree requirements in your program. · A brief description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in the state in which you plan to teach in, and how licensure/certification will be maintained. · Explanation of how you will demonstrate high expectations in your role as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies. · Explanation of how you will reflect on your teaching practices using a variety of data, including current research, and how this will help to inform instruction and improve student learning. · Provide at least two professional learning goals and discuss how you will engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community (e.g., professional development, conferences, professional organizations) to meet each learning goal. Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides **_Benchmark Information_** _This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:_ _MEd Elementary Education (ITL/NITL)_ _5.2: Reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data, including current research, to inform instruction and improve student learning. [InTASC 9(c), 9(g), 9(l); TPE 6.1; AAQEP 1e; MC2, MC4]_ ##### _5.5: Demonstrate high expectations of the profession including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant law and policy. [InTASC 9(j), 9(o); TPE 6.5, 6.6; AAQEP 1f; MC3, MC5]_ Rubric Criteria ##### Rubric Criteria Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All ###### Graduate Courses, Degree Requirements, and Certification Requirements 30 points ###### Criteria Description Graduate Courses, Degree Requirements, and Certification Requirements ###### 5. Target 30 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is thorough. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is extensive. ###### 4. Acceptable 26.1 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is complete. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is accurate. ###### 3. Approaching 22.2 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is missing key details. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is somewhat inaccurate. ###### 2. Insufficient 20.7 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is incomplete. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is inaccurate. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Demonstrating High Expectations (B) 45 points ###### Criteria Description C 5.5 ###### 5. Target 45 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is realistic. ###### 4. Acceptable 39.15 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is suitable. ###### 3. Approaching 33.3 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is ambiguous. ###### 2. Insufficient 31.05 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is unrealistic. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Reflection on Teaching Practices (B) 45 points ###### Criteria Description C 5.2 ###### 5. Target 45 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is novel. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is insightful. ###### 4. Acceptable 39.15 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is reasonable. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is logical. ###### 3. Approaching 33.3 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is cursory. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is artificial. ###### 2. Insufficient 31.05 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is unreasonable. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is unfitting. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Professional Learning Goals (B) 60 points ###### Criteria Description C 5.6 ###### 5. Target 60 points Professional learning goals are exceptional. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is sophisticated. ###### 4. Acceptable 52.2 points Professional learning goals are appropriate. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is effective. ###### 3. Approaching 44.4 points Professional learning goals are overly simplistic. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is weak. ###### 2. Insufficient 41.4 points Professional learning goals are inappropriate. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is ineffective. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Video Presentation 45 points ###### Criteria Description Video Presentation ###### 5. Target 45 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is proficient. ###### 4. Acceptable 39.15 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is solid. ###### 3. Approaching 33.3 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is unfocused. ###### 2. Insufficient 31.05 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is unintelligible. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Title Slide, Slide Notes, and Research Citations 15 points ###### Criteria Description Title Slide, Slide Notes, and Research Citations ###### 5. Target 15 points Title slide and thorough slide notes are present. In-text citations and a reference slide are complete and correct. Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Title slide and slide notes are present. In-text citations have few errors. References used are reliable and reference slide lists all cited sources with few errors. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Title slide, and/or slide notes, and/or reference slide are not present. Sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible. Sources are documented, although several errors are present. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points No title slide or slide notes are present. Reference slide includes errors and/or inconsistently used citations. Sources are noncredible. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Language Use and Audience Awareness 15 points ###### Criteria Description Language Use and Audience Awareness ###### 5. Target 15 points Word choice is distinctive, creative, and well-suited to the purpose, discipline, scope, and audience of the presentation. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Word choice is reflective of the intended audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary, and communicates clearly. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Some distracting inconsistencies or repetitions in word choice are present. Language is lacking awareness of the targeted audience. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points Inappropriate word choice is evident. Language is not reflective of the targeted audience. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Presentation 15 points ###### Criteria Description Presentation ###### 5. Target 15 points The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be desirable for public dissemination. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points The work is somewhat disheveled and includes several organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points The work is sloppy or chaotic. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Professionalism 15 points ###### Criteria Description Professionalism ###### 5. Target 15 points Appearance and manner exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Appearance and manner exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Appearance or manner within the video is lacking some degree of professionalism or the video includes some distraction in the environment or background. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points Appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional or the video is taken within a distracting environment or background. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Mechanics of Writing 15 points ###### Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. ###### 5. Target 15 points Presentation and speaker’s notes are free of mechanical errors. Skilled control of sentence structure is used throughout. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Presentation and speaker’s notes include a few mechanical errors. Suitable sentence structure is used. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Presentation and speaker’s notes include frequent and repetitive mechanical errors. Inconsistencies in sentence structure are recurrent. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points Presentation and speaker’s notes include errors in grammar or syntax that are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect sentence structure errors are found throughout. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. **Total** 300 points © 2024. [Grand Canyon University](https://www.gce.com/). All Rights Reserved. **## Powerpointhomeworkneedshelp.docx** This program of study leads to becoming a certified professional educator. It is important to understand the professional certification requirements in your state as well as the continuing education requirements to maintain your certification. Education is constantly changing so educators must be prepared to adapt and grow as the profession evolves. Setting professional goals and developing a plan to meet your goals is crucial to support professional growth and being a lifelong learner. **Part 1: Professional Growth Plan Presentation** Create an 8-12 slide digital presentation that can be used to present your plan for professional growth as an educator. Include the following information in your presentation: · A brief description of the graduate courses and degree requirements in your program. · A brief description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in the state in which you plan to teach in, and how licensure/certification will be maintained. · Explanation of how you will demonstrate high expectations in your role as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies. · Explanation of how you will reflect on your teaching practices using a variety of data, including current research, and how this will help to inform instruction and improve student learning. · Provide at least two professional learning goals and discuss how you will engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community (e.g., professional development, conferences, professional organizations) to meet each learning goal. Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide do not count in the total number of slides **_Benchmark Information_** _This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:_ _MEd Elementary Education (ITL/NITL)_ _5.2: Reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data, including current research, to inform instruction and improve student learning. [InTASC 9(c), 9(g), 9(l); TPE 6.1; AAQEP 1e; MC2, MC4]_ ##### _5.5: Demonstrate high expectations of the profession including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant law and policy. [InTASC 9(j), 9(o); TPE 6.5, 6.6; AAQEP 1f; MC3, MC5]_ Rubric Criteria ##### Rubric Criteria Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All ###### Graduate Courses, Degree Requirements, and Certification Requirements 30 points ###### Criteria Description Graduate Courses, Degree Requirements, and Certification Requirements ###### 5. Target 30 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is thorough. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is extensive. ###### 4. Acceptable 26.1 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is complete. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is accurate. ###### 3. Approaching 22.2 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is missing key details. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is somewhat inaccurate. ###### 2. Insufficient 20.7 points Description of graduate courses and degree requirements in the program is incomplete. Description of licensure/certification requirements, professional progression requirements in your state, and how licensure/certification will be maintained is inaccurate. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Demonstrating High Expectations (B) 45 points ###### Criteria Description C 5.5 ###### 5. Target 45 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is realistic. ###### 4. Acceptable 39.15 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is suitable. ###### 3. Approaching 33.3 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is ambiguous. ###### 2. Insufficient 31.05 points Explanation of how to demonstrate high expectations as an educator, including communication, technology, codes of ethics, professional standards practice, and relevant laws and policies is unrealistic. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Reflection on Teaching Practices (B) 45 points ###### Criteria Description C 5.2 ###### 5. Target 45 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is novel. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is insightful. ###### 4. Acceptable 39.15 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is reasonable. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is logical. ###### 3. Approaching 33.3 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is cursory. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is artificial. ###### 2. Insufficient 31.05 points Explanation of how an educator can reflect on teaching practices using a variety of data is unreasonable. Discussion of how reflection helps to inform instruction and improve student learning is unfitting. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Professional Learning Goals (B) 60 points ###### Criteria Description C 5.6 ###### 5. Target 60 points Professional learning goals are exceptional. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is sophisticated. ###### 4. Acceptable 52.2 points Professional learning goals are appropriate. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is effective. ###### 3. Approaching 44.4 points Professional learning goals are overly simplistic. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is weak. ###### 2. Insufficient 41.4 points Professional learning goals are inappropriate. Discussion of how to engage in meaningful experiences within the professional learning community to meet each learning goal is ineffective. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Video Presentation 45 points ###### Criteria Description Video Presentation ###### 5. Target 45 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is proficient. ###### 4. Acceptable 39.15 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is solid. ###### 3. Approaching 33.3 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is unfocused. ###### 2. Insufficient 31.05 points Presentation of the professional growth plan, including brief introduction, is unintelligible. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Title Slide, Slide Notes, and Research Citations 15 points ###### Criteria Description Title Slide, Slide Notes, and Research Citations ###### 5. Target 15 points Title slide and thorough slide notes are present. In-text citations and a reference slide are complete and correct. Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Title slide and slide notes are present. In-text citations have few errors. References used are reliable and reference slide lists all cited sources with few errors. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Title slide, and/or slide notes, and/or reference slide are not present. Sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible. Sources are documented, although several errors are present. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points No title slide or slide notes are present. Reference slide includes errors and/or inconsistently used citations. Sources are noncredible. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Language Use and Audience Awareness 15 points ###### Criteria Description Language Use and Audience Awareness ###### 5. Target 15 points Word choice is distinctive, creative, and well-suited to the purpose, discipline, scope, and audience of the presentation. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Word choice is reflective of the intended audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary, and communicates clearly. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Some distracting inconsistencies or repetitions in word choice are present. Language is lacking awareness of the targeted audience. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points Inappropriate word choice is evident. Language is not reflective of the targeted audience. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Presentation 15 points ###### Criteria Description Presentation ###### 5. Target 15 points The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be desirable for public dissemination. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points The work is somewhat disheveled and includes several organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points The work is sloppy or chaotic. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Professionalism 15 points ###### Criteria Description Professionalism ###### 5. Target 15 points Appearance and manner exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Appearance and manner exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Appearance or manner within the video is lacking some degree of professionalism or the video includes some distraction in the environment or background. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points Appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional or the video is taken within a distracting environment or background. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. ###### Mechanics of Writing 15 points ###### Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. ###### 5. Target 15 points Presentation and speaker’s notes are free of mechanical errors. Skilled control of sentence structure is used throughout. ###### 4. Acceptable 13.05 points Presentation and speaker’s notes include a few mechanical errors. Suitable sentence structure is used. ###### 3. Approaching 11.1 points Presentation and speaker’s notes include frequent and repetitive mechanical errors. Inconsistencies in sentence structure are recurrent. ###### 2. Insufficient 10.35 points Presentation and speaker’s notes include errors in grammar or syntax that are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect sentence structure errors are found throughout. ###### 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. **Total** 300 points © 2024. [Grand Canyon University](https://www.gce.com/). All Rights Reserved.