[Solved] speech 1 assisgn

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Instant Solution Download

.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## speech1assign.docx – ## spech1assisgnrubric.docx **## speech1assign.docx** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDkEVJPjzTM&t=6s Assessment Questions: · What is the topic of the speech? How do you know? · What type of speech is this? How do you know? · What audience was the speaker targeting? How do you know? · Based on your audience analysis, answer the following for the audience: · Was the speech introduction effective? Why or why not? Be specific. Explain your answer. · Describe how the speaker engaged the audience. What methods did the speaker use? Estimated time to complete: 2 hours **## spech1assisgnrubric.docx** **Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project** | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project | | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **15 pts** **Level 5** The assignment includes detailed responses to all of the questions: What is the topic of the speech? What type of speech is this? What audience was the speaker targeting? Was the speech introduction effective? Finally, the methods the speaker used to engage the audience are described. | **13.5 pts** **Level 4** The assignment includes detailed responses to all questions but does not describe the speaker's methods in enough detail. | **12 pts** **Level 3** The assignment includes answers to all questions but without the level of detail required. There is a minimal description of the speaker's methods. | **10.5 pts** **Level 2** The assignment includes minimal responses to most (but not all) of the questions and does not address the speaker's methods. | **9 pts** **Level 1** The assignment includes answers to some of the questions without the level of detail required. There is no description of the speaker's methods. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment includes 0 responses to the questions. | | 15 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **20 pts** **Level 5** Assignment identifies the audience and provides a full analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates critical thinking. | **18 pts** **Level 4** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 1 or 2 lapses in critical thinking. | **16 pts** **Level 3** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 3 or 4 lapses in critical thinking. | **14 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has significant gaps in the identification of the audience and/or analysis of the structure and content of the speech. | **12 pts** **Level 1** The limited analysis present in the assignment does not demonstrate critical thinking. | **0 pts** **Level 0** There is no analysis present in the assignment. | | 20 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting PRICE-R PRICE-I | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **5 pts** **Level 5** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and is error free in grammar and mechanics. Has no errors in APA formatting. | **4.5 pts** **Level 4** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and has only 1-2 errors in grammar and mechanics. Has only minor errors in APA formatting. | **4 pts** **Level 3** Assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA formatting. | **3.5 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA format that negatively impact readability. | **3 pts** **Level 1** The assignment was written with a number of errors that make meaning difficult to discern. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment was not submitted. | | 5 pts | | Total Points: 40 | **## spech1assisgnrubric.docx** **Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project** | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project | | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **15 pts** **Level 5** The assignment includes detailed responses to all of the questions: What is the topic of the speech? What type of speech is this? What audience was the speaker targeting? Was the speech introduction effective? Finally, the methods the speaker used to engage the audience are described. | **13.5 pts** **Level 4** The assignment includes detailed responses to all questions but does not describe the speaker's methods in enough detail. | **12 pts** **Level 3** The assignment includes answers to all questions but without the level of detail required. There is a minimal description of the speaker's methods. | **10.5 pts** **Level 2** The assignment includes minimal responses to most (but not all) of the questions and does not address the speaker's methods. | **9 pts** **Level 1** The assignment includes answers to some of the questions without the level of detail required. There is no description of the speaker's methods. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment includes 0 responses to the questions. | | 15 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **20 pts** **Level 5** Assignment identifies the audience and provides a full analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates critical thinking. | **18 pts** **Level 4** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 1 or 2 lapses in critical thinking. | **16 pts** **Level 3** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 3 or 4 lapses in critical thinking. | **14 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has significant gaps in the identification of the audience and/or analysis of the structure and content of the speech. | **12 pts** **Level 1** The limited analysis present in the assignment does not demonstrate critical thinking. | **0 pts** **Level 0** There is no analysis present in the assignment. | | 20 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting PRICE-R PRICE-I | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **5 pts** **Level 5** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and is error free in grammar and mechanics. Has no errors in APA formatting. | **4.5 pts** **Level 4** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and has only 1-2 errors in grammar and mechanics. Has only minor errors in APA formatting. | **4 pts** **Level 3** Assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA formatting. | **3.5 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA format that negatively impact readability. | **3 pts** **Level 1** The assignment was written with a number of errors that make meaning difficult to discern. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment was not submitted. | | 5 pts | | Total Points: 40 | **## speech1assign.docx** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDkEVJPjzTM&t=6s Assessment Questions: · What is the topic of the speech? How do you know? · What type of speech is this? How do you know? · What audience was the speaker targeting? How do you know? · Based on your audience analysis, answer the following for the audience: · Was the speech introduction effective? Why or why not? Be specific. Explain your answer. · Describe how the speaker engaged the audience. What methods did the speaker use? Estimated time to complete: 2 hours **## spech1assisgnrubric.docx** **Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project** | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project | | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **15 pts** **Level 5** The assignment includes detailed responses to all of the questions: What is the topic of the speech? What type of speech is this? What audience was the speaker targeting? Was the speech introduction effective? Finally, the methods the speaker used to engage the audience are described. | **13.5 pts** **Level 4** The assignment includes detailed responses to all questions but does not describe the speaker's methods in enough detail. | **12 pts** **Level 3** The assignment includes answers to all questions but without the level of detail required. There is a minimal description of the speaker's methods. | **10.5 pts** **Level 2** The assignment includes minimal responses to most (but not all) of the questions and does not address the speaker's methods. | **9 pts** **Level 1** The assignment includes answers to some of the questions without the level of detail required. There is no description of the speaker's methods. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment includes 0 responses to the questions. | | 15 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **20 pts** **Level 5** Assignment identifies the audience and provides a full analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates critical thinking. | **18 pts** **Level 4** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 1 or 2 lapses in critical thinking. | **16 pts** **Level 3** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 3 or 4 lapses in critical thinking. | **14 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has significant gaps in the identification of the audience and/or analysis of the structure and content of the speech. | **12 pts** **Level 1** The limited analysis present in the assignment does not demonstrate critical thinking. | **0 pts** **Level 0** There is no analysis present in the assignment. | | 20 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting PRICE-R PRICE-I | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **5 pts** **Level 5** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and is error free in grammar and mechanics. Has no errors in APA formatting. | **4.5 pts** **Level 4** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and has only 1-2 errors in grammar and mechanics. Has only minor errors in APA formatting. | **4 pts** **Level 3** Assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA formatting. | **3.5 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA format that negatively impact readability. | **3 pts** **Level 1** The assignment was written with a number of errors that make meaning difficult to discern. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment was not submitted. | | 5 pts | | Total Points: 40 | **## speech1assign.docx** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDkEVJPjzTM&t=6s Assessment Questions: · What is the topic of the speech? How do you know? · What type of speech is this? How do you know? · What audience was the speaker targeting? How do you know? · Based on your audience analysis, answer the following for the audience: · Was the speech introduction effective? Why or why not? Be specific. Explain your answer. · Describe how the speaker engaged the audience. What methods did the speaker use? Estimated time to complete: 2 hours **## spech1assisgnrubric.docx** **Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project** | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Unit 1 Assessment – Audience Analysis Project | | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **15 pts** **Level 5** The assignment includes detailed responses to all of the questions: What is the topic of the speech? What type of speech is this? What audience was the speaker targeting? Was the speech introduction effective? Finally, the methods the speaker used to engage the audience are described. | **13.5 pts** **Level 4** The assignment includes detailed responses to all questions but does not describe the speaker's methods in enough detail. | **12 pts** **Level 3** The assignment includes answers to all questions but without the level of detail required. There is a minimal description of the speaker's methods. | **10.5 pts** **Level 2** The assignment includes minimal responses to most (but not all) of the questions and does not address the speaker's methods. | **9 pts** **Level 1** The assignment includes answers to some of the questions without the level of detail required. There is no description of the speaker's methods. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment includes 0 responses to the questions. | | 15 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis EN116-CO1; EN116-CO4 | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **20 pts** **Level 5** Assignment identifies the audience and provides a full analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates critical thinking. | **18 pts** **Level 4** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 1 or 2 lapses in critical thinking. | **16 pts** **Level 3** Assignment identifies the audience and provides an analysis of the structure and content of the speech. The analysis demonstrates 3 or 4 lapses in critical thinking. | **14 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has significant gaps in the identification of the audience and/or analysis of the structure and content of the speech. | **12 pts** **Level 1** The limited analysis present in the assignment does not demonstrate critical thinking. | **0 pts** **Level 0** There is no analysis present in the assignment. | | 20 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting PRICE-R PRICE-I | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **5 pts** **Level 5** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and is error free in grammar and mechanics. Has no errors in APA formatting. | **4.5 pts** **Level 4** Assignment demonstrates academic tone and has only 1-2 errors in grammar and mechanics. Has only minor errors in APA formatting. | **4 pts** **Level 3** Assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA formatting. | **3.5 pts** **Level 2** Assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or APA format that negatively impact readability. | **3 pts** **Level 1** The assignment was written with a number of errors that make meaning difficult to discern. | **0 pts** **Level 0** Assignment was not submitted. | | 5 pts | | Total Points: 40 | – 1 – 2

Executive Solution Overview

Instant Solution Download

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Take the next step with this assignment

Join the discussion Cancel reply

Executive Solution Overview

Instant Solution Download

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Take the next step with this assignment

Related posts you may like

[Solved] SOCW 6101 WEEK 10 EVALUATION OF SKILLS: CLIENT SYSTEM ROLE-PLAY REFLECTION

[Solved] Pastense

[Solved] Aggregate planning strategies discussion question

Join the discussion Cancel reply