[Solved] Presentation/Assigment

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## Module1InstructionHW.docx **## Module1InstructionHW.docx** Module 1: Professional Pedagogical Reflection on First Clinical Experience and Call to Professional Commitment to Future Action **TCAP Components #1:Classroom Report & # 2:Professional Review, Self-Evaluation** **Review** the materials in [Module 1: Learning Activities](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/pages/module-1-learning-activities?wrap=1). **REVIEW THE RUBRIC!** Then **consider** your first teaching **experience** and your reflections and goal setting from Visions of Practice from you Field and Practicum I Course ( **EDSN 682 Module 11**) and from Observation Feedback ( **EDSN 682 Module 8**) . What were you able to plan and implement in your teaching to support student learning since completing EDSN 682? Pinpoint **two specific areas of strength (reinforcement) and two specific areas for improvement (refinement)** related to your instruction and delivery skills. In other words, what do you do well, and what do you need to improve as related to your teaching? What do you want to know and be able to do from a pedagogical lens by the end of this course? (see [Touro GSE Practicum Observation Rubric Domains 1, 2, 3, 4, 5](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/assignments/$CANVAS_COURSE_REFERENCE$/file_ref/mastercourse_10898_1387_0b1d0c507f865543c269eb7dd4055af2?wrap=1)). You will have opportunities to demonstrate your growth and development throughout this course. You will also have opportunities to refer to these responses and revise them as you grow throughout the semester. This professional pedagogical response will also be used in your final paper "Looking Backward/Looking Forward". In your response, · be thoughtful and thorough · use [academic languageLinks to an external site.](https://youtu.be/MjIfCYptPLg) · state your ideas clearly and provide rationale for your responses by referencing previous course work, the Module 1 readings and the following [Touro GSE CLOs](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/assignments/$CANVAS_COURSE_REFERENCE$/file_ref/mastercourse_10898_1387_3ada2bd616f53f1110f9ceb87b089f4c/download?wrap=1): · _Professional Commitment to Action_ · _Discipline Knowledge and Skills_ · _Equity and Access_ Your response should be limited to **no more than 500 words double spaced, typed (two pages)**. **TCAP Components #1:Classroom Report & # 2:Professional Review, Self-Evaluation** **Grading Rubric: Professional Pedagogical Response** | | | | | — | — | — | | Grading Rubric: Professional Pedagogical Response | | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsights into Teaching and Learning | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>3 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>2 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>1 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGoals for future practice (glow) | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>The 2 goals for the future practice (experience) are included. The 2 new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified. Using academic language or the language of the discipline clearly state your knowledge and understanding and provide rationale about your responses. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>The 2 goals for the future practice (experience) are included. The 2 new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified. Academic language and/or the language of the discipline and/or rationale about your responses is missing. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>The 1 goal for the future practice (experience) is included. The 1 new area for learning about teaching and student learning is identified. Academic language and/or the language of the discipline and/or rationale about your responses is missing. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflexive Praxis RP1: Are aware of and reflect on their practice in light of educational research, professional ethics and resources available for professional learning EA RP1. Examine and are aware of how one’s biases, privilege, identity, and socio-cultural experiences influence teaching and learning | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, social cultural experience, or privileges to improve teaching and learning. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, social cultural experience, or privileges regarding teaching and learning. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, regarding teaching and learning. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Commitment to Action EA PCA1. Integrate theory and practice as related to diversity and global perspectives EA PCA3. Advocate for educational equity and justice through research, policy, and practice | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>1. Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, and professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students and their well- being (e.g., belonging, inclusive classroom and school cultures). 2. Candidate advocates for educational equity or social justice through research, policy, or practice. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, or professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, or professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Literacy and Research EA DLR3. Knowledgeable of ethical, moral, and culturally responsive research methods and practices | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical research methods and culturally responsive and ethical use of research and data. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical and culturally responsive use of data or research. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical or culturally responsive use of data or research | | 3.4 pts | | Total Points: 17 | [Previous](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/modules/items/3807819) [Next](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/modules/items/3778055) **## Module1InstructionHW.docx** Module 1: Professional Pedagogical Reflection on First Clinical Experience and Call to Professional Commitment to Future Action **TCAP Components #1:Classroom Report & # 2:Professional Review, Self-Evaluation** **Review** the materials in [Module 1: Learning Activities](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/pages/module-1-learning-activities?wrap=1). **REVIEW THE RUBRIC!** Then **consider** your first teaching **experience** and your reflections and goal setting from Visions of Practice from you Field and Practicum I Course ( **EDSN 682 Module 11**) and from Observation Feedback ( **EDSN 682 Module 8**) . What were you able to plan and implement in your teaching to support student learning since completing EDSN 682? Pinpoint **two specific areas of strength (reinforcement) and two specific areas for improvement (refinement)** related to your instruction and delivery skills. In other words, what do you do well, and what do you need to improve as related to your teaching? What do you want to know and be able to do from a pedagogical lens by the end of this course? (see [Touro GSE Practicum Observation Rubric Domains 1, 2, 3, 4, 5](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/assignments/$CANVAS_COURSE_REFERENCE$/file_ref/mastercourse_10898_1387_0b1d0c507f865543c269eb7dd4055af2?wrap=1)). You will have opportunities to demonstrate your growth and development throughout this course. You will also have opportunities to refer to these responses and revise them as you grow throughout the semester. This professional pedagogical response will also be used in your final paper "Looking Backward/Looking Forward". In your response, · be thoughtful and thorough · use [academic languageLinks to an external site.](https://youtu.be/MjIfCYptPLg) · state your ideas clearly and provide rationale for your responses by referencing previous course work, the Module 1 readings and the following [Touro GSE CLOs](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/assignments/$CANVAS_COURSE_REFERENCE$/file_ref/mastercourse_10898_1387_3ada2bd616f53f1110f9ceb87b089f4c/download?wrap=1): · _Professional Commitment to Action_ · _Discipline Knowledge and Skills_ · _Equity and Access_ Your response should be limited to **no more than 500 words double spaced, typed (two pages)**. **TCAP Components #1:Classroom Report & # 2:Professional Review, Self-Evaluation** **Grading Rubric: Professional Pedagogical Response** | | | | | — | — | — | | Grading Rubric: Professional Pedagogical Response | | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsights into Teaching and Learning | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>3 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>2 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>1 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGoals for future practice (glow) | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>The 2 goals for the future practice (experience) are included. The 2 new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified. Using academic language or the language of the discipline clearly state your knowledge and understanding and provide rationale about your responses. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>The 2 goals for the future practice (experience) are included. The 2 new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified. Academic language and/or the language of the discipline and/or rationale about your responses is missing. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>The 1 goal for the future practice (experience) is included. The 1 new area for learning about teaching and student learning is identified. Academic language and/or the language of the discipline and/or rationale about your responses is missing. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflexive Praxis RP1: Are aware of and reflect on their practice in light of educational research, professional ethics and resources available for professional learning EA RP1. Examine and are aware of how one’s biases, privilege, identity, and socio-cultural experiences influence teaching and learning | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, social cultural experience, or privileges to improve teaching and learning. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, social cultural experience, or privileges regarding teaching and learning. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, regarding teaching and learning. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Commitment to Action EA PCA1. Integrate theory and practice as related to diversity and global perspectives EA PCA3. Advocate for educational equity and justice through research, policy, and practice | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>1. Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, and professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students and their well- being (e.g., belonging, inclusive classroom and school cultures). 2. Candidate advocates for educational equity or social justice through research, policy, or practice. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, or professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, or professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students. | | 3.4 pts | | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Literacy and Research EA DLR3. Knowledgeable of ethical, moral, and culturally responsive research methods and practices | | | | | | — | — | — | | **3.4 pts**<br>**Level 3**<br>Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical research methods and culturally responsive and ethical use of research and data. | **3 pts**<br>**Level 2**<br>Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical and culturally responsive use of data or research. | **2.6 pts**<br>**Level 1**<br>Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical or culturally responsive use of data or research | | 3.4 pts | | Total Points: 17 | [Previous](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/modules/items/3807819) [Next](https://touro.instructure.com/courses/117375/modules/items/3778055)