[Solved] English assignment

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## draftoffinalresearchessayinstroctions.docx – ## Israeli-Hannawaroutlinedraft2.docx **## draftoffinalresearchessayinstroctions.docx** M5D4: Draft of Final Research Essay – due 2/16 33 unread replies.33 replies. **Draft of Final Research Essay (paper)** **Pre-assignment Lesson:** **New Essay Structures** This assignment requires a draft essay (partial) for an Argument and Persuasion essay structure that includes Opposing View and Rebuttal sections and will be used for the Final Research Essay (paper). Review the required structures presented earlier in the modules and the new essay structure below: **Argument & Persuasion Essay Structure Required** >Paragraph 1 – Introduction >Paragraph 2 – Writer's position (same as thesis statement – place here instead of at end of Introduction.) >Paragraph 3-5 – Body paragraphs – Supporting Details that tie back to the three main points at the end of thesis statement. >Paragraph 6 – Opposing View >Paragraph 7 – Rebuttal to Opposing View >Paragraph 8- Conclusion >Work Cited Page **This Assignment:** Attach a draft of your Final Research Essay (as an MS Word document) using the structure provided in this lesson, especially considering all the essay sections/paragraphs required. **Required Thesis Statement for this assignment and Final Research Essay (paper) -** **You must use one of the following four.** · "Although there may be good reasons to militarily intervene in the Russian-Ukrainian War, the U.S. and its Allies **should not intervene militarily** in Ukraine **because** it may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be good reasons to militarily intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War, the U.S. and its Allies **should not intervene militarily** in Gaza **because** it may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be good reasons to not intervene militarily in the Russian-Ukrainian War, the U.S. and its Allies **should intervene** in Ukraine **because** not doing so may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be reasons to not intervene militarily in the Israeli-Hamas War, the U.S. and its Allies **should intervene** in Gaza **because** not doing so may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." **After attaching your response to this assignment, place the required critiques for two classmates. Make sure comments to classmates are a brief rhetorical analysis of their post. DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUBJECT MATTER, instead analyze how your classmate's attachment followed instructions, met the structural requirements of the assignment, and give examples of each.** **Do not use first person or second person in your response. (No: I, me, my, we, us, our, mine, you, your, etc…) Use MS Word to initially type your response. Double space the entire response. Then copy and paste from MSWord to the assignment text box.** **## Israeli-Hannawaroutlinedraft2.docx** Mantilla 2 Cirelda mantilla Carlos Canizares Enc1105 8 February 2024 Israeli-Hamas War I. **Introduction** A. “War does not determine who is right – only who is left.” Bertrand Russell B. The 2023 Israel-Hamas war has drawn attention worldwide due to its continuous onslaught. II. **Thesis:** Although there may be good reasons to intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War militarily, the U.S. and its Allies should not intervene militarily in Gaza because it may lead to escalation of conflicts, recourse allocations, Risk of civilian casualties III. **First supporting paragraph**: Military intervention is not ideal for Gaza because it could lead to increased conflict. A. Foreign military forces have been known to incite local vengeance and anger, worsening hostilities (Souleimanov, Siroky, & Colombo). B. Even when intended to restore peace, military operations can create new grievances or encourage extremist factions. IV. **Second supporting paragraph**: Additionally, military intervention could worsen the situation by diverting resources from pressing issues within the nation. A. Military operations and occupying forces would be funded instead of Gaza's essential social, economic, and humanitarian needs. B. Prioritizing military projects above development and social initiatives can perpetuate cycles of poverty, instability, and dependency, threatening the region's long-term peace and prosperity (Reliefweb). V. **Third supporting paragraph**: Moreover, military intervention could increase tensions, leading to more civilian casualties and deaths, thus worsening the situation. A. Military forces in densely populated regions increase the risk of civilian casualties since armed conflict typically overflows into civilian areas and infrastructure (Shumilova et al 580). B. Military actions can start a cycle of violence in which each act of aggression is retaliated, killing more innocent people and worsening the humanitarian catastrophe. VI. **Opposing view**: Despite these concerns, military intervention supporters say armed action is necessary to enforce international law or protect human rights. A. Military intervention advocates claim that the international community has a moral obligation to interfere when human rights abuses occur (Tomes 12). B. International law and resolutions are used to justify military intervention as required to protect the rule of law and prevent further crimes. VII. **Rebuttal to Opposing view:** While military action may assist human rights, the risks outweigh the advantages due to irrevocable damage to resources and people. A. Despite good intentions, military operations can cause massive destruction, death, and conflict escalation. B. Diplomatic, humanitarian, and peacebuilding initiatives should be emphasized over military power to address conflict fundamental causes and develop durable solutions that benefit all parties. VIII. **Conclusion**: Overall, while military intervention could be directed towards a good cause, allies and other humanitarian initiatives should consider the fatal impacts it could have on the nation, including escalating conflicts, poor resource allocation, and increased casualties and deaths. A. Instead of military action, diplomatic efforts should be increased to foster communication and negotiation. B. Mediation by neutral third parties or international organizations could help Israel and Hamas reach a solution. Works Cited Reliefweb. “Risk of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Threatening Stability of Wider Region Remains High, Senior UN Political Official Warns Security Council.” (2023). Retrieved From: https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/risk-israeli-palestinian-conflict-threatening-stability-wider-region-remains-high-senior-un-political-official-warns-security-council Shumilova, Oleksandra, et al. "Impact of the Russia–Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure." _Nature Sustainability_ 6.5 (2023): 578-586. Souleimanov, Emil Aslan, David S. Siroky, and Roberto Colombo. "Blood Revenge in Civil War: Proof of Concept." _Security Studies_ 32.1 (2023): 101-136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09636412.2023.2153731 Tomes, Robert. "Operation Allied Force and the Legal Basis for Humanitarian Interventions." _The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters_ 30.1 (2020): 12. 1 **## Israeli-Hannawaroutlinedraft2.docx** Mantilla 2 Cirelda mantilla Carlos Canizares Enc1105 8 February 2024 Israeli-Hamas War I. **Introduction** A. “War does not determine who is right – only who is left.” Bertrand Russell B. The 2023 Israel-Hamas war has drawn attention worldwide due to its continuous onslaught. II. **Thesis:** Although there may be good reasons to intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War militarily, the U.S. and its Allies should not intervene militarily in Gaza because it may lead to escalation of conflicts, recourse allocations, Risk of civilian casualties III. **First supporting paragraph**: Military intervention is not ideal for Gaza because it could lead to increased conflict. A. Foreign military forces have been known to incite local vengeance and anger, worsening hostilities (Souleimanov, Siroky, & Colombo). B. Even when intended to restore peace, military operations can create new grievances or encourage extremist factions. IV. **Second supporting paragraph**: Additionally, military intervention could worsen the situation by diverting resources from pressing issues within the nation. A. Military operations and occupying forces would be funded instead of Gaza's essential social, economic, and humanitarian needs. B. Prioritizing military projects above development and social initiatives can perpetuate cycles of poverty, instability, and dependency, threatening the region's long-term peace and prosperity (Reliefweb). V. **Third supporting paragraph**: Moreover, military intervention could increase tensions, leading to more civilian casualties and deaths, thus worsening the situation. A. Military forces in densely populated regions increase the risk of civilian casualties since armed conflict typically overflows into civilian areas and infrastructure (Shumilova et al 580). B. Military actions can start a cycle of violence in which each act of aggression is retaliated, killing more innocent people and worsening the humanitarian catastrophe. VI. **Opposing view**: Despite these concerns, military intervention supporters say armed action is necessary to enforce international law or protect human rights. A. Military intervention advocates claim that the international community has a moral obligation to interfere when human rights abuses occur (Tomes 12). B. International law and resolutions are used to justify military intervention as required to protect the rule of law and prevent further crimes. VII. **Rebuttal to Opposing view:** While military action may assist human rights, the risks outweigh the advantages due to irrevocable damage to resources and people. A. Despite good intentions, military operations can cause massive destruction, death, and conflict escalation. B. Diplomatic, humanitarian, and peacebuilding initiatives should be emphasized over military power to address conflict fundamental causes and develop durable solutions that benefit all parties. VIII. **Conclusion**: Overall, while military intervention could be directed towards a good cause, allies and other humanitarian initiatives should consider the fatal impacts it could have on the nation, including escalating conflicts, poor resource allocation, and increased casualties and deaths. A. Instead of military action, diplomatic efforts should be increased to foster communication and negotiation. B. Mediation by neutral third parties or international organizations could help Israel and Hamas reach a solution. Works Cited Reliefweb. “Risk of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Threatening Stability of Wider Region Remains High, Senior UN Political Official Warns Security Council.” (2023). Retrieved From: https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/risk-israeli-palestinian-conflict-threatening-stability-wider-region-remains-high-senior-un-political-official-warns-security-council Shumilova, Oleksandra, et al. "Impact of the Russia–Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure." _Nature Sustainability_ 6.5 (2023): 578-586. Souleimanov, Emil Aslan, David S. Siroky, and Roberto Colombo. "Blood Revenge in Civil War: Proof of Concept." _Security Studies_ 32.1 (2023): 101-136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09636412.2023.2153731 Tomes, Robert. "Operation Allied Force and the Legal Basis for Humanitarian Interventions." _The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters_ 30.1 (2020): 12. 1 **## draftoffinalresearchessayinstroctions.docx** M5D4: Draft of Final Research Essay – due 2/16 33 unread replies.33 replies. **Draft of Final Research Essay (paper)** **Pre-assignment Lesson:** **New Essay Structures** This assignment requires a draft essay (partial) for an Argument and Persuasion essay structure that includes Opposing View and Rebuttal sections and will be used for the Final Research Essay (paper). Review the required structures presented earlier in the modules and the new essay structure below: **Argument & Persuasion Essay Structure Required** >Paragraph 1 – Introduction >Paragraph 2 – Writer's position (same as thesis statement – place here instead of at end of Introduction.) >Paragraph 3-5 – Body paragraphs – Supporting Details that tie back to the three main points at the end of thesis statement. >Paragraph 6 – Opposing View >Paragraph 7 – Rebuttal to Opposing View >Paragraph 8- Conclusion >Work Cited Page **This Assignment:** Attach a draft of your Final Research Essay (as an MS Word document) using the structure provided in this lesson, especially considering all the essay sections/paragraphs required. **Required Thesis Statement for this assignment and Final Research Essay (paper) -** **You must use one of the following four.** · "Although there may be good reasons to militarily intervene in the Russian-Ukrainian War, the U.S. and its Allies **should not intervene militarily** in Ukraine **because** it may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be good reasons to militarily intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War, the U.S. and its Allies **should not intervene militarily** in Gaza **because** it may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be good reasons to not intervene militarily in the Russian-Ukrainian War, the U.S. and its Allies **should intervene** in Ukraine **because** not doing so may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be reasons to not intervene militarily in the Israeli-Hamas War, the U.S. and its Allies **should intervene** in Gaza **because** not doing so may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." **After attaching your response to this assignment, place the required critiques for two classmates. Make sure comments to classmates are a brief rhetorical analysis of their post. DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUBJECT MATTER, instead analyze how your classmate's attachment followed instructions, met the structural requirements of the assignment, and give examples of each.** **Do not use first person or second person in your response. (No: I, me, my, we, us, our, mine, you, your, etc…) Use MS Word to initially type your response. Double space the entire response. Then copy and paste from MSWord to the assignment text box.** **## Israeli-Hannawaroutlinedraft2.docx** Mantilla 2 Cirelda mantilla Carlos Canizares Enc1105 8 February 2024 Israeli-Hamas War I. **Introduction** A. “War does not determine who is right – only who is left.” Bertrand Russell B. The 2023 Israel-Hamas war has drawn attention worldwide due to its continuous onslaught. II. **Thesis:** Although there may be good reasons to intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War militarily, the U.S. and its Allies should not intervene militarily in Gaza because it may lead to escalation of conflicts, recourse allocations, Risk of civilian casualties III. **First supporting paragraph**: Military intervention is not ideal for Gaza because it could lead to increased conflict. A. Foreign military forces have been known to incite local vengeance and anger, worsening hostilities (Souleimanov, Siroky, & Colombo). B. Even when intended to restore peace, military operations can create new grievances or encourage extremist factions. IV. **Second supporting paragraph**: Additionally, military intervention could worsen the situation by diverting resources from pressing issues within the nation. A. Military operations and occupying forces would be funded instead of Gaza's essential social, economic, and humanitarian needs. B. Prioritizing military projects above development and social initiatives can perpetuate cycles of poverty, instability, and dependency, threatening the region's long-term peace and prosperity (Reliefweb). V. **Third supporting paragraph**: Moreover, military intervention could increase tensions, leading to more civilian casualties and deaths, thus worsening the situation. A. Military forces in densely populated regions increase the risk of civilian casualties since armed conflict typically overflows into civilian areas and infrastructure (Shumilova et al 580). B. Military actions can start a cycle of violence in which each act of aggression is retaliated, killing more innocent people and worsening the humanitarian catastrophe. VI. **Opposing view**: Despite these concerns, military intervention supporters say armed action is necessary to enforce international law or protect human rights. A. Military intervention advocates claim that the international community has a moral obligation to interfere when human rights abuses occur (Tomes 12). B. International law and resolutions are used to justify military intervention as required to protect the rule of law and prevent further crimes. VII. **Rebuttal to Opposing view:** While military action may assist human rights, the risks outweigh the advantages due to irrevocable damage to resources and people. A. Despite good intentions, military operations can cause massive destruction, death, and conflict escalation. B. Diplomatic, humanitarian, and peacebuilding initiatives should be emphasized over military power to address conflict fundamental causes and develop durable solutions that benefit all parties. VIII. **Conclusion**: Overall, while military intervention could be directed towards a good cause, allies and other humanitarian initiatives should consider the fatal impacts it could have on the nation, including escalating conflicts, poor resource allocation, and increased casualties and deaths. A. Instead of military action, diplomatic efforts should be increased to foster communication and negotiation. B. Mediation by neutral third parties or international organizations could help Israel and Hamas reach a solution. Works Cited Reliefweb. “Risk of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Threatening Stability of Wider Region Remains High, Senior UN Political Official Warns Security Council.” (2023). Retrieved From: https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/risk-israeli-palestinian-conflict-threatening-stability-wider-region-remains-high-senior-un-political-official-warns-security-council Shumilova, Oleksandra, et al. "Impact of the Russia–Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure." _Nature Sustainability_ 6.5 (2023): 578-586. Souleimanov, Emil Aslan, David S. Siroky, and Roberto Colombo. "Blood Revenge in Civil War: Proof of Concept." _Security Studies_ 32.1 (2023): 101-136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09636412.2023.2153731 Tomes, Robert. "Operation Allied Force and the Legal Basis for Humanitarian Interventions." _The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters_ 30.1 (2020): 12. 1 **## draftoffinalresearchessayinstroctions.docx** M5D4: Draft of Final Research Essay – due 2/16 33 unread replies.33 replies. **Draft of Final Research Essay (paper)** **Pre-assignment Lesson:** **New Essay Structures** This assignment requires a draft essay (partial) for an Argument and Persuasion essay structure that includes Opposing View and Rebuttal sections and will be used for the Final Research Essay (paper). Review the required structures presented earlier in the modules and the new essay structure below: **Argument & Persuasion Essay Structure Required** >Paragraph 1 – Introduction >Paragraph 2 – Writer's position (same as thesis statement – place here instead of at end of Introduction.) >Paragraph 3-5 – Body paragraphs – Supporting Details that tie back to the three main points at the end of thesis statement. >Paragraph 6 – Opposing View >Paragraph 7 – Rebuttal to Opposing View >Paragraph 8- Conclusion >Work Cited Page **This Assignment:** Attach a draft of your Final Research Essay (as an MS Word document) using the structure provided in this lesson, especially considering all the essay sections/paragraphs required. **Required Thesis Statement for this assignment and Final Research Essay (paper) -** **You must use one of the following four.** · "Although there may be good reasons to militarily intervene in the Russian-Ukrainian War, the U.S. and its Allies **should not intervene militarily** in Ukraine **because** it may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be good reasons to militarily intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War, the U.S. and its Allies **should not intervene militarily** in Gaza **because** it may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be good reasons to not intervene militarily in the Russian-Ukrainian War, the U.S. and its Allies **should intervene** in Ukraine **because** not doing so may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." · "Although there may be reasons to not intervene militarily in the Israeli-Hamas War, the U.S. and its Allies **should intervene** in Gaza **because** not doing so may lead to (reason #1), (reason #2), and (reason #3)." **After attaching your response to this assignment, place the required critiques for two classmates. Make sure comments to classmates are a brief rhetorical analysis of their post. DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUBJECT MATTER, instead analyze how your classmate's attachment followed instructions, met the structural requirements of the assignment, and give examples of each.** **Do not use first person or second person in your response. (No: I, me, my, we, us, our, mine, you, your, etc…) Use MS Word to initially type your response. Double space the entire response. Then copy and paste from MSWord to the assignment text box.** **## Israeli-Hannawaroutlinedraft2.docx** Mantilla 2 Cirelda mantilla Carlos Canizares Enc1105 8 February 2024 Israeli-Hamas War I. **Introduction** A. “War does not determine who is right – only who is left.” Bertrand Russell B. The 2023 Israel-Hamas war has drawn attention worldwide due to its continuous onslaught. II. **Thesis:** Although there may be good reasons to intervene in the Israeli-Hamas War militarily, the U.S. and its Allies should not intervene militarily in Gaza because it may lead to escalation of conflicts, recourse allocations, Risk of civilian casualties III. **First supporting paragraph**: Military intervention is not ideal for Gaza because it could lead to increased conflict. A. Foreign military forces have been known to incite local vengeance and anger, worsening hostilities (Souleimanov, Siroky, & Colombo). B. Even when intended to restore peace, military operations can create new grievances or encourage extremist factions. IV. **Second supporting paragraph**: Additionally, military intervention could worsen the situation by diverting resources from pressing issues within the nation. A. Military operations and occupying forces would be funded instead of Gaza's essential social, economic, and humanitarian needs. B. Prioritizing military projects above development and social initiatives can perpetuate cycles of poverty, instability, and dependency, threatening the region's long-term peace and prosperity (Reliefweb). V. **Third supporting paragraph**: Moreover, military intervention could increase tensions, leading to more civilian casualties and deaths, thus worsening the situation. A. Military forces in densely populated regions increase the risk of civilian casualties since armed conflict typically overflows into civilian areas and infrastructure (Shumilova et al 580). B. Military actions can start a cycle of violence in which each act of aggression is retaliated, killing more innocent people and worsening the humanitarian catastrophe. VI. **Opposing view**: Despite these concerns, military intervention supporters say armed action is necessary to enforce international law or protect human rights. A. Military intervention advocates claim that the international community has a moral obligation to interfere when human rights abuses occur (Tomes 12). B. International law and resolutions are used to justify military intervention as required to protect the rule of law and prevent further crimes. VII. **Rebuttal to Opposing view:** While military action may assist human rights, the risks outweigh the advantages due to irrevocable damage to resources and people. A. Despite good intentions, military operations can cause massive destruction, death, and conflict escalation. B. Diplomatic, humanitarian, and peacebuilding initiatives should be emphasized over military power to address conflict fundamental causes and develop durable solutions that benefit all parties. VIII. **Conclusion**: Overall, while military intervention could be directed towards a good cause, allies and other humanitarian initiatives should consider the fatal impacts it could have on the nation, including escalating conflicts, poor resource allocation, and increased casualties and deaths. A. Instead of military action, diplomatic efforts should be increased to foster communication and negotiation. B. Mediation by neutral third parties or international organizations could help Israel and Hamas reach a solution. Works Cited Reliefweb. “Risk of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Threatening Stability of Wider Region Remains High, Senior UN Political Official Warns Security Council.” (2023). Retrieved From: https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/risk-israeli-palestinian-conflict-threatening-stability-wider-region-remains-high-senior-un-political-official-warns-security-council Shumilova, Oleksandra, et al. "Impact of the Russia–Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure." _Nature Sustainability_ 6.5 (2023): 578-586. Souleimanov, Emil Aslan, David S. Siroky, and Roberto Colombo. "Blood Revenge in Civil War: Proof of Concept." _Security Studies_ 32.1 (2023): 101-136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09636412.2023.2153731 Tomes, Robert. "Operation Allied Force and the Legal Basis for Humanitarian Interventions." _The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters_ 30.1 (2020): 12. 1 – 1 – 2