[Solved] W2 R see attachment

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## Week2respondtoastudent-Copy.docx **## Week2respondtoastudent-Copy.docx** **Make a follow-up of a student's weekly discussion and respond with your opinion regarding to her post** **——You don't have to post this in APA format necessarily, it's just giving feedback to the student .** Review the PICOT questions of two of your peers. Provide substantive feedback and suggestions for improvement. [**Shelby**](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/135434/users/301401) **McKinney** Dr. Mandel and classmates, After reviewing the instruction video a second time, I have formatted my original post a bit differently. I hope that this is sufficient. Thank you! · Population: Pediatric Patients between the ages of 0-6 years of age · Intervention: Providing both verbal and written vaccination education to parents/guardians · Comparison: Compared to providing minimal to no education to parents/guardians · Current standard of practice when patients come to an office for vaccination is to give a pamphlet before administering immunizations. The majority of practices give patients and/or guardians an information sheet or leaflet, but they don't explain anything verbally or give them opportunity to ask questions or voice concerns. In a recent study following a new intervention, the vaccination rejection rate fell (from 9.00% pre-intervention to 6.40% post-intervention) (Jamison et al., 2022). · Outcome: Increased overall vaccination compliance rates · Time: Over the next 12 months Formatted PICOT question: For pediatric patients between the ages of 0-6 years of age, will providing both verbal and written vaccination education to parents/guardians in comparison to providing minimal to no education, increase overall vaccination compliance rates, over the next 12 months? Jamison, K. C., Ahmed, A. H., Spoerner, D. A., & Kinney, D. (2022). Best shot: A motivational interviewing approach to address vaccine hesitancy in pediatric outpatient settings. _Journal of Pediatric Nursing_, _67_, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.08.012 **## Week2respondtoastudent-Copy.docx** **Make a follow-up of a student's weekly discussion and respond with your opinion regarding to her post** **——You don't have to post this in APA format necessarily, it's just giving feedback to the student .** Review the PICOT questions of two of your peers. Provide substantive feedback and suggestions for improvement. [**Shelby**](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/135434/users/301401) **McKinney** Dr. Mandel and classmates, After reviewing the instruction video a second time, I have formatted my original post a bit differently. I hope that this is sufficient. Thank you! · Population: Pediatric Patients between the ages of 0-6 years of age · Intervention: Providing both verbal and written vaccination education to parents/guardians · Comparison: Compared to providing minimal to no education to parents/guardians · Current standard of practice when patients come to an office for vaccination is to give a pamphlet before administering immunizations. The majority of practices give patients and/or guardians an information sheet or leaflet, but they don't explain anything verbally or give them opportunity to ask questions or voice concerns. In a recent study following a new intervention, the vaccination rejection rate fell (from 9.00% pre-intervention to 6.40% post-intervention) (Jamison et al., 2022). · Outcome: Increased overall vaccination compliance rates · Time: Over the next 12 months Formatted PICOT question: For pediatric patients between the ages of 0-6 years of age, will providing both verbal and written vaccination education to parents/guardians in comparison to providing minimal to no education, increase overall vaccination compliance rates, over the next 12 months? Jamison, K. C., Ahmed, A. H., Spoerner, D. A., & Kinney, D. (2022). Best shot: A motivational interviewing approach to address vaccine hesitancy in pediatric outpatient settings. _Journal of Pediatric Nursing_, _67_, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.08.012