[Solved] W-4 see attachment

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## Week4Discussioninstructions.docx – Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool1.docx **## Week4Discussioninstructions.docx** Chamberlain [NR505NP-10882](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/137034) Week 4 Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique Collaboration Café With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application. Complete the [Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site.](https://cdn.brandfolder.io/74235FBJ/at/ph629hp6rmnkp6xqrm26br/Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool.docx) [Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/111383/files/20426260/download?download_frd=1). Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following: · Description of the purpose · Explanation of research design · Discussion of sample · Description of data collection methods · Summary of findings · Strengths of the study (minimum of 1) · Limitations of the study (minimum of 1) · Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate. Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post. During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change. The John Hopkins tool **does not** need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have. For full credit, submit your initial post by Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. Complete your two responses to peers by Sunday at 11:59 PM MT. **To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. **Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool1.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/johns-hopkins-research-appraisal-tool1-docx) **Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool1.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/johns-hopkins-research-appraisal-tool1-docx) **## Week4Discussioninstructions.docx** Chamberlain [NR505NP-10882](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/137034) Week 4 Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique Collaboration Café With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application. Complete the [Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site.](https://cdn.brandfolder.io/74235FBJ/at/ph629hp6rmnkp6xqrm26br/Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool.docx) [Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/111383/files/20426260/download?download_frd=1). Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following: · Description of the purpose · Explanation of research design · Discussion of sample · Description of data collection methods · Summary of findings · Strengths of the study (minimum of 1) · Limitations of the study (minimum of 1) · Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate. Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post. During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change. The John Hopkins tool **does not** need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have. For full credit, submit your initial post by Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. Complete your two responses to peers by Sunday at 11:59 PM MT. **To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. **Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool1.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/johns-hopkins-research-appraisal-tool1-docx) **## Week4Discussioninstructions.docx** Chamberlain [NR505NP-10882](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/137034) Week 4 Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique Collaboration Café With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application. Complete the [Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site.](https://cdn.brandfolder.io/74235FBJ/at/ph629hp6rmnkp6xqrm26br/Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool.docx) [Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool](https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/111383/files/20426260/download?download_frd=1). Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following: · Description of the purpose · Explanation of research design · Discussion of sample · Description of data collection methods · Summary of findings · Strengths of the study (minimum of 1) · Limitations of the study (minimum of 1) · Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate. Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post. During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change. The John Hopkins tool **does not** need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have. For full credit, submit your initial post by Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. Complete your two responses to peers by Sunday at 11:59 PM MT. **To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. **Johns_Hopkins_Research_Appraisal_Tool1.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/johns-hopkins-research-appraisal-tool1-docx) – 1 – 2