[Solved] Project Draft

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Please see all files attached – ## LEARNINGOUTCOMECoverSheet-Blank.docx – ## Scottv.Harris-Presentation-LO2.pptx – ## CRASH2004PRESENTATION-LO4.pptx – ## PaperforLO1.docx – ## Presentation-LO5.pptx – Righttodie-Presentation-LO3.pptx – PAPERFORLO4.docx – GuidelinesDraft.docx – PAPERFORLO3.docx – PAPERFORLO2.docx – PAPERFORLO6.docx – PAPERFORLO5.docx **## LEARNINGOUTCOMECoverSheet-Blank.docx** Criminal Justice Portfolio LEARNING OUTCOME Cover Sheet PAPER TITLE: COURSE: YEAR/SEMESTER COMPLETED: LEARNING OUTCOME ADDRESSED: WHY/HOW DOES THIS WORK REPRESENT YOUR PROFICIENCY IN THE STATED LEARNING OUTCOME? WHAT WERE THE CHALLENGES YOU FACED IN COMPLETING THIS WORK? WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE BIGGEST STRENGTH OF THIS WORK? THE BIGGEST WEAKNESS? **## Scottv.Harris-Presentation-LO2.pptx** LEGAL CASE: Scott v. Harris (2007) Jens Martensson OVERVIEW Case Summary Use of Force Precision Intervention Technique (‘PIT’) Technological Changes Evidence Police Pursuits Jens Martensson Summary This was a legal case of Scott v. Harris (2007) High-speed pursuit that occurred in Georgia in 2001 Victor Harris, a 19-year-old driver of the fleeing vehicle Deputy Scott, lead officer pursuing Harris Harris was traveling at 73 mph in a 55 mph zone Harris continued to accelerate and fled from the officer Deputy Scott deliberately bumped his cruiser into Harris’s car Harris filed a federal lawsuit against Deputy Scott Jens Martensson Main Issue: Use of Force 6 Jens Martensson The use of force has been a fundamental element of law enforcement Relevant Supreme Court Cases: Tennessee v. Garner Precision Intervention Technique (‘PIT’) Technological Changes : Evidence Technological advancement has transformed the way law enforcement operates The high-speed chase was captured from the cruiser of Deputy Scott Video Footage can be tampered with or altered The video did not show the entire chase 1 2 Advantages Disadvantages Jens Martensson 6 Jens Martensson PRESENTATION BREAK: DISCUSSION TIME QUESTIONS: Should Deputy Scott entitle to qualified immunity of the Fourth Amendment? If Deputy Scott was not granted immunity of the Fourth Amendment, who else is accountable for his actions? Jens Martensson Police Pursuits The use of police pursuits has a complex history in law enforcement Three policy models: Discretionary Restrictive Discouraging Jens Martensson Fatal crashes involving police pursuits kill more than one person every day Jens Martensson In summary, Scott v. Harris set a precedent for the use of reasonable force, including deadly force, in pursuits to prevent death or serious injury. Large Image slide Jens Martensson Thank You Jens Martensson ## image1.jpeg ## image3.jpeg ## image2.jpeg ## image4.jpeg ## image5.jpeg ## image12.jpeg ## image13.jpeg ## image14.png ## image15.png ## image16.jpeg ## image17.png **## CRASH2004PRESENTATION-LO4.pptx** CRASH (2004) CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES OVERVIEW: Introduction to “CRASH (2004)” Marxism Theory Application Left Realism Theory Application Feminism Theory Application Peacemaking Theory Application Postmodernism Theory Application Cultural Criminology Application Conclusion 2 Introduction to CRASH (2004) Directed by Paul Haggis Explores race, status, gender, and power in Los Angeles Interwoven narratives reveal socio-criminological impacts Marxism Theory Application ECONOMIC & CLASS DIMENSIONS Evaluates characters' behavior and social structures affecting decisions. INSTITUTIONAL BIASES Systemic discrimination within the legal system and its power dynamics. HEGEMONIC STRATEGY Power and control dissemination through media, police, and institutions. Left Realism Theory Application SOCIAL INEQUALITY Highlights structural inequalities and their influence on crime. INNER-CITY VIOLENCE Focuses on crime causes in the urban contexts and the “square of crime ANTHONY’S CHARACTER Examines the offender-victim connection and systemic challenges. Feminism Theory Application GENDER, POWER, & INEQUALITY Focuses on gender dynamics and power imbalances in society. INTERSECTIONALITY Explores how race, class, and gender shape characters’ experiences. JEAN CABOT’S CHARACTER Analyzes the influence of race and class on perceptions of crime. Peacemaking Theory Application CONFLICT & RESOLUTION Focus on human connections and transformational conflict resolution. INTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS Enhance analysis of interpersonal dynamics but may oversimplify societal themes. OFFICER HANSON’S CHARCTER Demonstrates peacemaking principles through empathy and understanding Postmodernism Theory Application 8 REALITY & OBJECTIVITY Questions reality, deconstructs dualities, and challenges traditional narratives. POWER DYNAMICS Analyzes power languages and symbols that reproduce inequality CHARACTER ANALYSIS Examines Officer Ryan’s character through postmodern concepts Cultural Criminology Application MEDIA & CRIME Examines the relationships between crime, media, and society CULTURAL CRIMINALIZATION Analyzes how popular culture is criminalized through media portrayals. DAILY LIFE & CRIME Explores the interdependence of daily life and crime in diverse individuals. Conclusion MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS Each theory provides insights but also has limitations A comprehensive understanding requires multiple theoretical frameworks The film’s complexity is best appreciated through a combination of perspectives Click to edit master text style ## image1.jpeg ## image2.jpeg ## image3.png ## image4.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill_v2 { fill:#DDDDDD; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Stroke_v2 { stroke:#DDDDDD; } ## image5.jpeg ## image6.jpeg ## image7.jpeg ## image8.jpeg **## PaperforLO1.docx** ## Game Warden: Things to Know About Them CRJ 100: Introduction to Criminal Justice ( 1 ) ## Abstract With a growing need to protect wildlife and natural environments, game wardens were established as peaceful law enforcement officers in ensuring adherence to the rules and regulations pertaining to fish and wildlife hunting. The history of game wardens can be traced back in 1880 with the establishment of Maine Warden Services. Uncontrolled hunting and fishing necessitated regulation due to the threat exposed to wildlife Technology has improved and changed the way in which game wardens enforce laws, educate the community, and also engage in other wildlife management activities. Becoming a game warden requires a relevant educational level depending on the job skills and the post requirements. The government plays an important role in establishing the legal authorities that help game warden law enforcement at all levels of governance. Those who fail to comply with the wildlife laws are subject to strict liability offenses. _Keywords: Game warden, law, wildlife, wardens, enforcement, laws, legal, hunting activities_ ## Game Warden: Things to Know About Them To be able to maintain the balance of peace in the world, law enforcement was established to protect its citizens and also nature and wildlife. The Game Wardens have risen to become a serious part of the current hunting culture, dealing with guaranteeing that a licensed individual operates as per the limits, regulations, and the specified time of the year. They are responsible for the law enforcement of fisheries and wildlife environments. ## History of Game Warden The Maine Warden Service was founded back in 1880. Their primary task was to enforce the laws providing care to Maine’s moose and deer. In the 1890s, hunting and fishing became uncontrollable which put the wildlife at risk. The department enacted “The September Law” which was an early license program. The law is a licensing program that costs hunters to pay $4.00 for residents and $6.00 non-residents and allows them to kill one deer in the month of September. The Game Warden grew progressively over the years, with significant changes with the introduction of technology in the 2000s. The department made a major strategic and technological update. After a decade, the department partnered with Animal Planet to create North Woods Law, a TV series that documented the day-to-day life and work of Maine Game Wardens. Today’s game warders are working towards achieving their mission by using modern technology and new techniques in carrying out their extensive range of responsibilities from law enforcement to education and angler surveys. ## How to be a Game Warden? In delivering services, the majority of game wardens jobs stipulate specific requirements that regard education, strong moral character, and experience. Applicants must be 21 years old or have 60 college credits. While a college degree is not a requirement, the process of being a game warden is highly competitive. Many applicants acquire a bachelor's degree in areas such as criminal justice or biology. The first step in the application process is taking the comprehensive oral board exam. After passing the exam and hiring process the applicants will undergo two phases of training. The first one will be 18 weeks of Basic Law Enforcement Training Program (BLETP). Once the applicant graduates from BLETP they will move forward to the second phase which is 12 weeks of Advanced Warden Academy. Game warden grants you different types of careers. The salary range for game wardens in Maine is $44,033- $72,259 depending on your position. I had the opportunity to interview District Warden Orchard, Megan. According to her, the career she has varies depending on the season, which includes issuing fishing and hunting licenses. Another job includes investigation, search and rescue, running hunter education and safety programs. She had her career as a district warden for almost four years now and she hopes to apply for a sergeant position in the future. As a game warden, she involves herself to the community through speaking events, such as fair events, classes that involve law enforcement, and the local parade. ## How does the Game Warden enforce the law? The government brought up the legal authority concerning wildlife and nature conservation. Although these legal authorities vary somehow along with the locales, the game wardens are granting them powers to engage in any law enforcement activity. The game wardens have legal cross-deputation with the other jurisdictions to provide legal authority when there is a need. Game warden officers are deputized with additional functions by agencies like National Marine Fisheries to help in enforcing laws within the State. On the burden of proof, individuals violating the wildlife laws may receive citations as 'strict liability’ offenses. Some of the game warden officers have powers to exercise personal discretion and offer leniency to individuals who have committed a particular crime due to an honest mistake or the genuine ignorance of the law. In this regard, game wardens have the legal powers to enforce unlawful trapping, forbid some of the criminal activities, and help in the arrest of the individuals engaged in unlawful activities. ## Concluding Topic Law enforcement forms an important aspect in management of the marine and other wildlife environments. The need to control wildlife hunting and marine fishing activities have necessitated establishment of game wardens. Game wardens are trained on wildlife law enforcement and other advanced training for ensuring efficient compliance of the laws through enforcement activities. Government provides the legal authority to game wardens in exercising their powers. Game wardens on the other hand, enforce wildlife laws by following the legal provisions provided by the wildlife management agencies. ## References Eliason, S. L. (2016). Game warden perceptions of change in conservation law enforcement. _The Police Journal_, _89_(3), 218-226. GameWardenEDU.org. (2020). How to Become a Fish and Game Warden in Maine. [https://www.gamewardenedu.org/maine/](https://www.gamewardenedu.org/maine/) Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. (2020). History of the Maine Warden Service. [https://www.maine.gov/ifw/warden-service/history.html](https://www.maine.gov/ifw/warden-service/history.html) Warden Orchard M. (2020, March 28). Phone interview **## Presentation-LO5.pptx** The ATF and the Branch Davidians Objective Introduction History Waco Siege How the ATF and FBI changed after the event? Introduction The US departments of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) launched a raid at Mount Carmel in Waco, Texas. The raid was done against a religious cult called the Branch Davidians and its purpose was to investigate any possession of explosions and firearms. The event resulted in injuries and four federal agents being killed. Following the unsuccessful ATF raid, tear-gas assault was executed in order for the Branch Davidian to surrender. However, during the operation the compound was set on fire and resulting a large number of casualties. History David Koresh (previous name: Vernon Howell) joined a Branch of the Seventh-day Adventist church that was named the Branch Davidians. Koresh had an exhaustive understanding of the Bible scriptures and believes he is the second coming of Jesus Christ. At the time, George Roden was the Davidian’s leader when Koresh decided to raid the compound with his followers, resulting Roden in critical injuries. Koresh and his followers were sent for trial for attempted murder, however, the charges were dropped as the leaders declared his case a ministerial endeavor. Towards the end of 1990, Koresh became the leader of the Branch Davidians. After taking leadership, he took multiple wives and fathered over 12 children from each wife. Waco Siege The operation took place between February 28 and April 19, 1993. David Koresh led the Branch Davidians to resist the raid. Following the resistance, an intense gunfight started leading to the death of six Branch Davidians and four government officials. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) took over the investigation and that lasted for 51 days. On April 19th, 1993, tear-gas was launched in an attempt to get the Branch Davidian members surrender. Following the FBI’s assault, the whole compound was surrounded by flames. The fire led to the death of more than 70 members of the Branch Davidians including David Koresh. How the ATF and FBI changed after the event? The ATF and FBI changed after the Waco siege event include; the two agencies became better equipped in terms of resources needed for such events. FBI and ATF agents invested in tactical equipment and improved weapons systems, along with training on using tear gas and automatic weapons. The FBI also implemented a Critical Response Group to ensure prompt communication when it came to negotiations and collaboration between teams in critical situations. ## image4.png ## image2.png ## image3.png ## image1.png **Righttodie-Presentation-LO3.pptx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/righttodie-presentation-lo3-pptx) **PAPERFORLO4.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo4-docx) **GuidelinesDraft.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/guidelinesdraft-docx-9714571) **PAPERFORLO3.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo3-docx) **PAPERFORLO2.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo2-docx) **PAPERFORLO6.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo6-docx) **PAPERFORLO5.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo5-docx) **PAPERFORLO5.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo5-docx) **## LEARNINGOUTCOMECoverSheet-Blank.docx** Criminal Justice Portfolio LEARNING OUTCOME Cover Sheet PAPER TITLE: COURSE: YEAR/SEMESTER COMPLETED: LEARNING OUTCOME ADDRESSED: WHY/HOW DOES THIS WORK REPRESENT YOUR PROFICIENCY IN THE STATED LEARNING OUTCOME? WHAT WERE THE CHALLENGES YOU FACED IN COMPLETING THIS WORK? WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE BIGGEST STRENGTH OF THIS WORK? THE BIGGEST WEAKNESS? **## Scottv.Harris-Presentation-LO2.pptx** LEGAL CASE: Scott v. Harris (2007) Jens Martensson OVERVIEW Case Summary Use of Force Precision Intervention Technique (‘PIT’) Technological Changes Evidence Police Pursuits Jens Martensson Summary This was a legal case of Scott v. Harris (2007) High-speed pursuit that occurred in Georgia in 2001 Victor Harris, a 19-year-old driver of the fleeing vehicle Deputy Scott, lead officer pursuing Harris Harris was traveling at 73 mph in a 55 mph zone Harris continued to accelerate and fled from the officer Deputy Scott deliberately bumped his cruiser into Harris’s car Harris filed a federal lawsuit against Deputy Scott Jens Martensson Main Issue: Use of Force 6 Jens Martensson The use of force has been a fundamental element of law enforcement Relevant Supreme Court Cases: Tennessee v. Garner Precision Intervention Technique (‘PIT’) Technological Changes : Evidence Technological advancement has transformed the way law enforcement operates The high-speed chase was captured from the cruiser of Deputy Scott Video Footage can be tampered with or altered The video did not show the entire chase 1 2 Advantages Disadvantages Jens Martensson 6 Jens Martensson PRESENTATION BREAK: DISCUSSION TIME QUESTIONS: Should Deputy Scott entitle to qualified immunity of the Fourth Amendment? If Deputy Scott was not granted immunity of the Fourth Amendment, who else is accountable for his actions? Jens Martensson Police Pursuits The use of police pursuits has a complex history in law enforcement Three policy models: Discretionary Restrictive Discouraging Jens Martensson Fatal crashes involving police pursuits kill more than one person every day Jens Martensson In summary, Scott v. Harris set a precedent for the use of reasonable force, including deadly force, in pursuits to prevent death or serious injury. Large Image slide Jens Martensson Thank You Jens Martensson ## image1.jpeg ## image3.jpeg ## image2.jpeg ## image4.jpeg ## image5.jpeg ## image12.jpeg ## image13.jpeg ## image14.png ## image15.png ## image16.jpeg ## image17.png **## CRASH2004PRESENTATION-LO4.pptx** CRASH (2004) CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES OVERVIEW: Introduction to “CRASH (2004)” Marxism Theory Application Left Realism Theory Application Feminism Theory Application Peacemaking Theory Application Postmodernism Theory Application Cultural Criminology Application Conclusion 2 Introduction to CRASH (2004) Directed by Paul Haggis Explores race, status, gender, and power in Los Angeles Interwoven narratives reveal socio-criminological impacts Marxism Theory Application ECONOMIC & CLASS DIMENSIONS Evaluates characters' behavior and social structures affecting decisions. INSTITUTIONAL BIASES Systemic discrimination within the legal system and its power dynamics. HEGEMONIC STRATEGY Power and control dissemination through media, police, and institutions. Left Realism Theory Application SOCIAL INEQUALITY Highlights structural inequalities and their influence on crime. INNER-CITY VIOLENCE Focuses on crime causes in the urban contexts and the “square of crime ANTHONY’S CHARACTER Examines the offender-victim connection and systemic challenges. Feminism Theory Application GENDER, POWER, & INEQUALITY Focuses on gender dynamics and power imbalances in society. INTERSECTIONALITY Explores how race, class, and gender shape characters’ experiences. JEAN CABOT’S CHARACTER Analyzes the influence of race and class on perceptions of crime. Peacemaking Theory Application CONFLICT & RESOLUTION Focus on human connections and transformational conflict resolution. INTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS Enhance analysis of interpersonal dynamics but may oversimplify societal themes. OFFICER HANSON’S CHARCTER Demonstrates peacemaking principles through empathy and understanding Postmodernism Theory Application 8 REALITY & OBJECTIVITY Questions reality, deconstructs dualities, and challenges traditional narratives. POWER DYNAMICS Analyzes power languages and symbols that reproduce inequality CHARACTER ANALYSIS Examines Officer Ryan’s character through postmodern concepts Cultural Criminology Application MEDIA & CRIME Examines the relationships between crime, media, and society CULTURAL CRIMINALIZATION Analyzes how popular culture is criminalized through media portrayals. DAILY LIFE & CRIME Explores the interdependence of daily life and crime in diverse individuals. Conclusion MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS Each theory provides insights but also has limitations A comprehensive understanding requires multiple theoretical frameworks The film’s complexity is best appreciated through a combination of perspectives Click to edit master text style ## image1.jpeg ## image2.jpeg ## image3.png ## image4.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill_v2 { fill:#DDDDDD; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Stroke_v2 { stroke:#DDDDDD; } ## image5.jpeg ## image6.jpeg ## image7.jpeg ## image8.jpeg **## PaperforLO1.docx** ## Game Warden: Things to Know About Them CRJ 100: Introduction to Criminal Justice ( 1 ) ## Abstract With a growing need to protect wildlife and natural environments, game wardens were established as peaceful law enforcement officers in ensuring adherence to the rules and regulations pertaining to fish and wildlife hunting. The history of game wardens can be traced back in 1880 with the establishment of Maine Warden Services. Uncontrolled hunting and fishing necessitated regulation due to the threat exposed to wildlife Technology has improved and changed the way in which game wardens enforce laws, educate the community, and also engage in other wildlife management activities. Becoming a game warden requires a relevant educational level depending on the job skills and the post requirements. The government plays an important role in establishing the legal authorities that help game warden law enforcement at all levels of governance. Those who fail to comply with the wildlife laws are subject to strict liability offenses. _Keywords: Game warden, law, wildlife, wardens, enforcement, laws, legal, hunting activities_ ## Game Warden: Things to Know About Them To be able to maintain the balance of peace in the world, law enforcement was established to protect its citizens and also nature and wildlife. The Game Wardens have risen to become a serious part of the current hunting culture, dealing with guaranteeing that a licensed individual operates as per the limits, regulations, and the specified time of the year. They are responsible for the law enforcement of fisheries and wildlife environments. ## History of Game Warden The Maine Warden Service was founded back in 1880. Their primary task was to enforce the laws providing care to Maine’s moose and deer. In the 1890s, hunting and fishing became uncontrollable which put the wildlife at risk. The department enacted “The September Law” which was an early license program. The law is a licensing program that costs hunters to pay $4.00 for residents and $6.00 non-residents and allows them to kill one deer in the month of September. The Game Warden grew progressively over the years, with significant changes with the introduction of technology in the 2000s. The department made a major strategic and technological update. After a decade, the department partnered with Animal Planet to create North Woods Law, a TV series that documented the day-to-day life and work of Maine Game Wardens. Today’s game warders are working towards achieving their mission by using modern technology and new techniques in carrying out their extensive range of responsibilities from law enforcement to education and angler surveys. ## How to be a Game Warden? In delivering services, the majority of game wardens jobs stipulate specific requirements that regard education, strong moral character, and experience. Applicants must be 21 years old or have 60 college credits. While a college degree is not a requirement, the process of being a game warden is highly competitive. Many applicants acquire a bachelor's degree in areas such as criminal justice or biology. The first step in the application process is taking the comprehensive oral board exam. After passing the exam and hiring process the applicants will undergo two phases of training. The first one will be 18 weeks of Basic Law Enforcement Training Program (BLETP). Once the applicant graduates from BLETP they will move forward to the second phase which is 12 weeks of Advanced Warden Academy. Game warden grants you different types of careers. The salary range for game wardens in Maine is $44,033- $72,259 depending on your position. I had the opportunity to interview District Warden Orchard, Megan. According to her, the career she has varies depending on the season, which includes issuing fishing and hunting licenses. Another job includes investigation, search and rescue, running hunter education and safety programs. She had her career as a district warden for almost four years now and she hopes to apply for a sergeant position in the future. As a game warden, she involves herself to the community through speaking events, such as fair events, classes that involve law enforcement, and the local parade. ## How does the Game Warden enforce the law? The government brought up the legal authority concerning wildlife and nature conservation. Although these legal authorities vary somehow along with the locales, the game wardens are granting them powers to engage in any law enforcement activity. The game wardens have legal cross-deputation with the other jurisdictions to provide legal authority when there is a need. Game warden officers are deputized with additional functions by agencies like National Marine Fisheries to help in enforcing laws within the State. On the burden of proof, individuals violating the wildlife laws may receive citations as 'strict liability’ offenses. Some of the game warden officers have powers to exercise personal discretion and offer leniency to individuals who have committed a particular crime due to an honest mistake or the genuine ignorance of the law. In this regard, game wardens have the legal powers to enforce unlawful trapping, forbid some of the criminal activities, and help in the arrest of the individuals engaged in unlawful activities. ## Concluding Topic Law enforcement forms an important aspect in management of the marine and other wildlife environments. The need to control wildlife hunting and marine fishing activities have necessitated establishment of game wardens. Game wardens are trained on wildlife law enforcement and other advanced training for ensuring efficient compliance of the laws through enforcement activities. Government provides the legal authority to game wardens in exercising their powers. Game wardens on the other hand, enforce wildlife laws by following the legal provisions provided by the wildlife management agencies. ## References Eliason, S. L. (2016). Game warden perceptions of change in conservation law enforcement. _The Police Journal_, _89_(3), 218-226. GameWardenEDU.org. (2020). How to Become a Fish and Game Warden in Maine. [https://www.gamewardenedu.org/maine/](https://www.gamewardenedu.org/maine/) Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. (2020). History of the Maine Warden Service. [https://www.maine.gov/ifw/warden-service/history.html](https://www.maine.gov/ifw/warden-service/history.html) Warden Orchard M. (2020, March 28). Phone interview **## Presentation-LO5.pptx** The ATF and the Branch Davidians Objective Introduction History Waco Siege How the ATF and FBI changed after the event? Introduction The US departments of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) launched a raid at Mount Carmel in Waco, Texas. The raid was done against a religious cult called the Branch Davidians and its purpose was to investigate any possession of explosions and firearms. The event resulted in injuries and four federal agents being killed. Following the unsuccessful ATF raid, tear-gas assault was executed in order for the Branch Davidian to surrender. However, during the operation the compound was set on fire and resulting a large number of casualties. History David Koresh (previous name: Vernon Howell) joined a Branch of the Seventh-day Adventist church that was named the Branch Davidians. Koresh had an exhaustive understanding of the Bible scriptures and believes he is the second coming of Jesus Christ. At the time, George Roden was the Davidian’s leader when Koresh decided to raid the compound with his followers, resulting Roden in critical injuries. Koresh and his followers were sent for trial for attempted murder, however, the charges were dropped as the leaders declared his case a ministerial endeavor. Towards the end of 1990, Koresh became the leader of the Branch Davidians. After taking leadership, he took multiple wives and fathered over 12 children from each wife. Waco Siege The operation took place between February 28 and April 19, 1993. David Koresh led the Branch Davidians to resist the raid. Following the resistance, an intense gunfight started leading to the death of six Branch Davidians and four government officials. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) took over the investigation and that lasted for 51 days. On April 19th, 1993, tear-gas was launched in an attempt to get the Branch Davidian members surrender. Following the FBI’s assault, the whole compound was surrounded by flames. The fire led to the death of more than 70 members of the Branch Davidians including David Koresh. How the ATF and FBI changed after the event? The ATF and FBI changed after the Waco siege event include; the two agencies became better equipped in terms of resources needed for such events. FBI and ATF agents invested in tactical equipment and improved weapons systems, along with training on using tear gas and automatic weapons. The FBI also implemented a Critical Response Group to ensure prompt communication when it came to negotiations and collaboration between teams in critical situations. ## image4.png ## image2.png ## image3.png ## image1.png **Righttodie-Presentation-LO3.pptx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/righttodie-presentation-lo3-pptx) **PAPERFORLO4.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo4-docx) **GuidelinesDraft.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/guidelinesdraft-docx-9714571) **PAPERFORLO3.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo3-docx) **PAPERFORLO2.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo2-docx) **PAPERFORLO6.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo6-docx) **PAPERFORLO5.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo5-docx) **## LEARNINGOUTCOMECoverSheet-Blank.docx** Criminal Justice Portfolio LEARNING OUTCOME Cover Sheet PAPER TITLE: COURSE: YEAR/SEMESTER COMPLETED: LEARNING OUTCOME ADDRESSED: WHY/HOW DOES THIS WORK REPRESENT YOUR PROFICIENCY IN THE STATED LEARNING OUTCOME? WHAT WERE THE CHALLENGES YOU FACED IN COMPLETING THIS WORK? WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE BIGGEST STRENGTH OF THIS WORK? THE BIGGEST WEAKNESS? **## Scottv.Harris-Presentation-LO2.pptx** LEGAL CASE: Scott v. Harris (2007) Jens Martensson OVERVIEW Case Summary Use of Force Precision Intervention Technique (‘PIT’) Technological Changes Evidence Police Pursuits Jens Martensson Summary This was a legal case of Scott v. Harris (2007) High-speed pursuit that occurred in Georgia in 2001 Victor Harris, a 19-year-old driver of the fleeing vehicle Deputy Scott, lead officer pursuing Harris Harris was traveling at 73 mph in a 55 mph zone Harris continued to accelerate and fled from the officer Deputy Scott deliberately bumped his cruiser into Harris’s car Harris filed a federal lawsuit against Deputy Scott Jens Martensson Main Issue: Use of Force 6 Jens Martensson The use of force has been a fundamental element of law enforcement Relevant Supreme Court Cases: Tennessee v. Garner Precision Intervention Technique (‘PIT’) Technological Changes : Evidence Technological advancement has transformed the way law enforcement operates The high-speed chase was captured from the cruiser of Deputy Scott Video Footage can be tampered with or altered The video did not show the entire chase 1 2 Advantages Disadvantages Jens Martensson 6 Jens Martensson PRESENTATION BREAK: DISCUSSION TIME QUESTIONS: Should Deputy Scott entitle to qualified immunity of the Fourth Amendment? If Deputy Scott was not granted immunity of the Fourth Amendment, who else is accountable for his actions? Jens Martensson Police Pursuits The use of police pursuits has a complex history in law enforcement Three policy models: Discretionary Restrictive Discouraging Jens Martensson Fatal crashes involving police pursuits kill more than one person every day Jens Martensson In summary, Scott v. Harris set a precedent for the use of reasonable force, including deadly force, in pursuits to prevent death or serious injury. Large Image slide Jens Martensson Thank You Jens Martensson ## image1.jpeg ## image3.jpeg ## image2.jpeg ## image4.jpeg ## image5.jpeg ## image12.jpeg ## image13.jpeg ## image14.png ## image15.png ## image16.jpeg ## image17.png **## CRASH2004PRESENTATION-LO4.pptx** CRASH (2004) CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES OVERVIEW: Introduction to “CRASH (2004)” Marxism Theory Application Left Realism Theory Application Feminism Theory Application Peacemaking Theory Application Postmodernism Theory Application Cultural Criminology Application Conclusion 2 Introduction to CRASH (2004) Directed by Paul Haggis Explores race, status, gender, and power in Los Angeles Interwoven narratives reveal socio-criminological impacts Marxism Theory Application ECONOMIC & CLASS DIMENSIONS Evaluates characters' behavior and social structures affecting decisions. INSTITUTIONAL BIASES Systemic discrimination within the legal system and its power dynamics. HEGEMONIC STRATEGY Power and control dissemination through media, police, and institutions. Left Realism Theory Application SOCIAL INEQUALITY Highlights structural inequalities and their influence on crime. INNER-CITY VIOLENCE Focuses on crime causes in the urban contexts and the “square of crime ANTHONY’S CHARACTER Examines the offender-victim connection and systemic challenges. Feminism Theory Application GENDER, POWER, & INEQUALITY Focuses on gender dynamics and power imbalances in society. INTERSECTIONALITY Explores how race, class, and gender shape characters’ experiences. JEAN CABOT’S CHARACTER Analyzes the influence of race and class on perceptions of crime. Peacemaking Theory Application CONFLICT & RESOLUTION Focus on human connections and transformational conflict resolution. INTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS Enhance analysis of interpersonal dynamics but may oversimplify societal themes. OFFICER HANSON’S CHARCTER Demonstrates peacemaking principles through empathy and understanding Postmodernism Theory Application 8 REALITY & OBJECTIVITY Questions reality, deconstructs dualities, and challenges traditional narratives. POWER DYNAMICS Analyzes power languages and symbols that reproduce inequality CHARACTER ANALYSIS Examines Officer Ryan’s character through postmodern concepts Cultural Criminology Application MEDIA & CRIME Examines the relationships between crime, media, and society CULTURAL CRIMINALIZATION Analyzes how popular culture is criminalized through media portrayals. DAILY LIFE & CRIME Explores the interdependence of daily life and crime in diverse individuals. Conclusion MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS Each theory provides insights but also has limitations A comprehensive understanding requires multiple theoretical frameworks The film’s complexity is best appreciated through a combination of perspectives Click to edit master text style ## image1.jpeg ## image2.jpeg ## image3.png ## image4.svg .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill_v2 { fill:#DDDDDD; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Stroke_v2 { stroke:#DDDDDD; } ## image5.jpeg ## image6.jpeg ## image7.jpeg ## image8.jpeg **## PaperforLO1.docx** ## Game Warden: Things to Know About Them CRJ 100: Introduction to Criminal Justice ( 1 ) ## Abstract With a growing need to protect wildlife and natural environments, game wardens were established as peaceful law enforcement officers in ensuring adherence to the rules and regulations pertaining to fish and wildlife hunting. The history of game wardens can be traced back in 1880 with the establishment of Maine Warden Services. Uncontrolled hunting and fishing necessitated regulation due to the threat exposed to wildlife Technology has improved and changed the way in which game wardens enforce laws, educate the community, and also engage in other wildlife management activities. Becoming a game warden requires a relevant educational level depending on the job skills and the post requirements. The government plays an important role in establishing the legal authorities that help game warden law enforcement at all levels of governance. Those who fail to comply with the wildlife laws are subject to strict liability offenses. _Keywords: Game warden, law, wildlife, wardens, enforcement, laws, legal, hunting activities_ ## Game Warden: Things to Know About Them To be able to maintain the balance of peace in the world, law enforcement was established to protect its citizens and also nature and wildlife. The Game Wardens have risen to become a serious part of the current hunting culture, dealing with guaranteeing that a licensed individual operates as per the limits, regulations, and the specified time of the year. They are responsible for the law enforcement of fisheries and wildlife environments. ## History of Game Warden The Maine Warden Service was founded back in 1880. Their primary task was to enforce the laws providing care to Maine’s moose and deer. In the 1890s, hunting and fishing became uncontrollable which put the wildlife at risk. The department enacted “The September Law” which was an early license program. The law is a licensing program that costs hunters to pay $4.00 for residents and $6.00 non-residents and allows them to kill one deer in the month of September. The Game Warden grew progressively over the years, with significant changes with the introduction of technology in the 2000s. The department made a major strategic and technological update. After a decade, the department partnered with Animal Planet to create North Woods Law, a TV series that documented the day-to-day life and work of Maine Game Wardens. Today’s game warders are working towards achieving their mission by using modern technology and new techniques in carrying out their extensive range of responsibilities from law enforcement to education and angler surveys. ## How to be a Game Warden? In delivering services, the majority of game wardens jobs stipulate specific requirements that regard education, strong moral character, and experience. Applicants must be 21 years old or have 60 college credits. While a college degree is not a requirement, the process of being a game warden is highly competitive. Many applicants acquire a bachelor's degree in areas such as criminal justice or biology. The first step in the application process is taking the comprehensive oral board exam. After passing the exam and hiring process the applicants will undergo two phases of training. The first one will be 18 weeks of Basic Law Enforcement Training Program (BLETP). Once the applicant graduates from BLETP they will move forward to the second phase which is 12 weeks of Advanced Warden Academy. Game warden grants you different types of careers. The salary range for game wardens in Maine is $44,033- $72,259 depending on your position. I had the opportunity to interview District Warden Orchard, Megan. According to her, the career she has varies depending on the season, which includes issuing fishing and hunting licenses. Another job includes investigation, search and rescue, running hunter education and safety programs. She had her career as a district warden for almost four years now and she hopes to apply for a sergeant position in the future. As a game warden, she involves herself to the community through speaking events, such as fair events, classes that involve law enforcement, and the local parade. ## How does the Game Warden enforce the law? The government brought up the legal authority concerning wildlife and nature conservation. Although these legal authorities vary somehow along with the locales, the game wardens are granting them powers to engage in any law enforcement activity. The game wardens have legal cross-deputation with the other jurisdictions to provide legal authority when there is a need. Game warden officers are deputized with additional functions by agencies like National Marine Fisheries to help in enforcing laws within the State. On the burden of proof, individuals violating the wildlife laws may receive citations as 'strict liability’ offenses. Some of the game warden officers have powers to exercise personal discretion and offer leniency to individuals who have committed a particular crime due to an honest mistake or the genuine ignorance of the law. In this regard, game wardens have the legal powers to enforce unlawful trapping, forbid some of the criminal activities, and help in the arrest of the individuals engaged in unlawful activities. ## Concluding Topic Law enforcement forms an important aspect in management of the marine and other wildlife environments. The need to control wildlife hunting and marine fishing activities have necessitated establishment of game wardens. Game wardens are trained on wildlife law enforcement and other advanced training for ensuring efficient compliance of the laws through enforcement activities. Government provides the legal authority to game wardens in exercising their powers. Game wardens on the other hand, enforce wildlife laws by following the legal provisions provided by the wildlife management agencies. ## References Eliason, S. L. (2016). Game warden perceptions of change in conservation law enforcement. _The Police Journal_, _89_(3), 218-226. GameWardenEDU.org. (2020). How to Become a Fish and Game Warden in Maine. [https://www.gamewardenedu.org/maine/](https://www.gamewardenedu.org/maine/) Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. (2020). History of the Maine Warden Service. [https://www.maine.gov/ifw/warden-service/history.html](https://www.maine.gov/ifw/warden-service/history.html) Warden Orchard M. (2020, March 28). Phone interview **## Presentation-LO5.pptx** The ATF and the Branch Davidians Objective Introduction History Waco Siege How the ATF and FBI changed after the event? Introduction The US departments of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) launched a raid at Mount Carmel in Waco, Texas. The raid was done against a religious cult called the Branch Davidians and its purpose was to investigate any possession of explosions and firearms. The event resulted in injuries and four federal agents being killed. Following the unsuccessful ATF raid, tear-gas assault was executed in order for the Branch Davidian to surrender. However, during the operation the compound was set on fire and resulting a large number of casualties. History David Koresh (previous name: Vernon Howell) joined a Branch of the Seventh-day Adventist church that was named the Branch Davidians. Koresh had an exhaustive understanding of the Bible scriptures and believes he is the second coming of Jesus Christ. At the time, George Roden was the Davidian’s leader when Koresh decided to raid the compound with his followers, resulting Roden in critical injuries. Koresh and his followers were sent for trial for attempted murder, however, the charges were dropped as the leaders declared his case a ministerial endeavor. Towards the end of 1990, Koresh became the leader of the Branch Davidians. After taking leadership, he took multiple wives and fathered over 12 children from each wife. Waco Siege The operation took place between February 28 and April 19, 1993. David Koresh led the Branch Davidians to resist the raid. Following the resistance, an intense gunfight started leading to the death of six Branch Davidians and four government officials. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) took over the investigation and that lasted for 51 days. On April 19th, 1993, tear-gas was launched in an attempt to get the Branch Davidian members surrender. Following the FBI’s assault, the whole compound was surrounded by flames. The fire led to the death of more than 70 members of the Branch Davidians including David Koresh. How the ATF and FBI changed after the event? The ATF and FBI changed after the Waco siege event include; the two agencies became better equipped in terms of resources needed for such events. FBI and ATF agents invested in tactical equipment and improved weapons systems, along with training on using tear gas and automatic weapons. The FBI also implemented a Critical Response Group to ensure prompt communication when it came to negotiations and collaboration between teams in critical situations. ## image4.png ## image2.png ## image3.png ## image1.png **Righttodie-Presentation-LO3.pptx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/righttodie-presentation-lo3-pptx) **PAPERFORLO4.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo4-docx) **GuidelinesDraft.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/guidelinesdraft-docx-9714571) **PAPERFORLO3.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo3-docx) **PAPERFORLO2.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo2-docx) **PAPERFORLO6.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo6-docx) **PAPERFORLO5.docx** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paperforlo5-docx) – 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 – 10 – 11 – 12