[Solved] MANAGING PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS FINAL

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

I should get 90 percent for this assessment because I failed midterm and its really necessary to get 90 percent. – ## TaskbriefFinalAssignmentBCOBM112ManagingPeopleOrganizationsFall2023OL-2.pdf **## TaskbriefFinalAssignmentBCOBM112ManagingPeopleOrganizationsFall2023OL-2.pdf** BCOBM112 Managing People and Organizations Task brief & rubrics Professor: Dr. Olga Leontjeva Task • An individual task. • Present the result of your research on training and performance & remuneration challenges facing people managers in contemporary international organization/s of your choice. • Expected table of contents: o A brief description of the company/s (industry, structure, mission, the period of activity analysed). o Define and describe the challenge the organisation has or ever had in the past. ▪ If the organisation succeeded in overcoming the challenge, identify and evaluate the winning decisions of the managers related to this success. ▪ If the organisation failed overcoming the challenge, identify and evaluate the wrong decisions of the managers related to this failure. ▪ If the organisation is still experiencing the challenging situation, propose your solutions (identify positive aspects of your proposals as well as possible drawbacks/risks associated). • Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered within the course. • Use reliable sources of information! • Format: a .pdf document. Formalities: • Wordcount: 1500 words -/+ 10%. • Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount. • Font: Arial 12,5 pts. • Text alignment: Justified. • The in-text References and the Bibliography must be in Harvard’s citation style. Submission: Week 13 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Sunday 21st January 2024, 23:59. Weight: This task is 60% of your total grade for this subject. It assesses the following learning outcomes: • Outcome 1: Identify employee training needs, as well as methods and tools used to create effective training programs. • Outcome 2: Identify characteristics of effective performance management and employee reward systems. Rubrics Learning Descriptors Fail Below 60% Marginal Fail 60-69% Fair 70-79 % Good 80-89% Exceptional 90-100% Purpose & Understanding KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING 30% Very poor coverage of central purpose, goals, research questions or arguments with little relevant information evident. Virtually no evidence of understanding or focus. Minimal understanding of purpose of the study; factual errors evident. Gaps in knowledge and superficial understanding. A few lines of relevant material. Reasonable understanding and clearly identifies the purpose, goals, research questions or argument. Reflect partial achievement of learning outcomes. A sound grasp of, and clearly identifies, the purpose, goals, research questions or argument. Some wider study beyond the classroom content shown. Effectively describes and explains the central purpose, arguments, research questions, or goals of the project; explanation is focused, detailed and compelling. Recognition of alternative forms of evidence beyond that supplied in the classroom. Analytical / Critical Thinking Skills CRITICAL THINKING 30 % Research problems, concepts or ideas are not clearly articulated, or its component elements are not identified or described. Research information is poorly organized, categorized and/or not examined; research information is often inaccurate or incomplete. Presents little if any analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents few solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are often not well supported, are inaccurate and/or inconsistent, and are presented in a vague or rudimentary manner. Research problems, concepts or ideas are not clearly articulated at times and confusing. Research information is badly organized, categorized, and/or only superficially examined; research information is often incomplete. Presents limited analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents some solutions or conclusions but they are often not well supported, or logical. Adequately identifies and describes (or sketches out) the research problem, concept or idea and its components. Gathers and examines information relating to the research problem, concept, or idea; presents and appraises research information with some minor inconsistencies, irrelevancies, or omissions. Generally, applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories although with inaccuracies. Outlines solutions or conclusions that are somewhat logical and consistent with the analysis and evidence; identifies and/or lists solutions or conclusions although not always clearly. Formulates a clear description of the research problem, concept, or idea, and specifies major elements to be examined. Selects information appropriate to addressing the research problem, concept, or idea; accurately and appropriately analyses and interprets relevant research information. Effectively applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories in developing and justifying multiple solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are coherent, well supported, and complete. Effectively formulates a clear description of the research problem, concept, or idea, and specifies major elements to be examined. Selects and prioritizes information appropriate to addressing the research problem, concept, or idea; accurately and appropriately analyzes and interprets relevant research information. Precisely and effectively applies appropriate research methods, employs advanced skills to conduct research. Uses techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories in developing and justifying multiple solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are insightful, coherent, well supported, logically consistent and complete. Displays a mastery of complex and specialized areas. Integration Skills APPLICATION & EVALUATION 30 % Shows little ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to the research problem, concept, or idea. Does not recognize or correctly identify cross- functional organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept, or idea. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept, or idea considering relevant principles, theories, and practices across the business functional areas. Few if any solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, and/or they are not appropriately justified or supported. Shows some ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to research problems, concepts, or idea. Recognizes organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept or idea but does not show understanding. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept, or idea considering relevant principles, theories, and practices across the business functional areas. Some solutions offered but difficult to understand. Recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, but they are often not well supported, or logical. Exhibits application of principles, theories, and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept or idea. With some exceptions, outlines and describes (or sketches out) some cross- functional organizational issues that are relevant to the research problem, concept, or idea. Adequately identifies and describes (or summarizes) solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions that are, for the most part, appropriate, but which need to be more aligned with principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Demonstrates an ability to integrate and apply principles, theories, and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept, or idea. Identifies, examines, and critically evaluates important cross- functional organizational issues associated with the research problem, concept, or idea. Clearly justifies solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions based on analytics and an insightful synthesis of cross- disciplinary principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Demonstrates well- developed ability to integrate and apply principles, theories, and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept, or idea. Effectively identifies, examines, and critically evaluates important cross- functional organizational issues associated with the research problem, concept, or idea. Clearly and effectively justify solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions based on strong analytics and an insightful synthesis of cross- disciplinary principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Can link thinking across disciplines and contexts. Written Communication Skills COMMUNICATION Set 10% The written project exhibits multiple errors in grammar, sentence structure and/or spelling. Inadequate writing skills (e.g., weaknesses in language facility and mechanics) hinder readability and contribute to an ineffective research project. The written project exhibits errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The written project comes across as untidy and not properly checked for mistakes. Errors present in written communication make readability frustrating. Written research project displays good word choice, language conventions and mechanics with a few minor errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure and/or punctuation. Errors do not represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. The readability of the project is good due to the clarity of language used. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are without error. Spelling and grammar thoroughly checked. The readability of the project is enhanced by facility in language use/word choice. Excellent mechanics and syntactic variety. Uses language conventions effectively (e.g., spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, paragraphing, grammar, etc.). **## TaskbriefFinalAssignmentBCOBM112ManagingPeopleOrganizationsFall2023OL-2.pdf** BCOBM112 Managing People and Organizations Task brief & rubrics Professor: Dr. Olga Leontjeva Task • An individual task. • Present the result of your research on training and performance & remuneration challenges facing people managers in contemporary international organization/s of your choice. • Expected table of contents: o A brief description of the company/s (industry, structure, mission, the period of activity analysed). o Define and describe the challenge the organisation has or ever had in the past. ▪ If the organisation succeeded in overcoming the challenge, identify and evaluate the winning decisions of the managers related to this success. ▪ If the organisation failed overcoming the challenge, identify and evaluate the wrong decisions of the managers related to this failure. ▪ If the organisation is still experiencing the challenging situation, propose your solutions (identify positive aspects of your proposals as well as possible drawbacks/risks associated). • Use relevant vocabulary and concepts covered within the course. • Use reliable sources of information! • Format: a .pdf document. Formalities: • Wordcount: 1500 words -/+ 10%. • Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount. • Font: Arial 12,5 pts. • Text alignment: Justified. • The in-text References and the Bibliography must be in Harvard’s citation style. Submission: Week 13 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Sunday 21st January 2024, 23:59. Weight: This task is 60% of your total grade for this subject. It assesses the following learning outcomes: • Outcome 1: Identify employee training needs, as well as methods and tools used to create effective training programs. • Outcome 2: Identify characteristics of effective performance management and employee reward systems. Rubrics Learning Descriptors Fail Below 60% Marginal Fail 60-69% Fair 70-79 % Good 80-89% Exceptional 90-100% Purpose & Understanding KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING 30% Very poor coverage of central purpose, goals, research questions or arguments with little relevant information evident. Virtually no evidence of understanding or focus. Minimal understanding of purpose of the study; factual errors evident. Gaps in knowledge and superficial understanding. A few lines of relevant material. Reasonable understanding and clearly identifies the purpose, goals, research questions or argument. Reflect partial achievement of learning outcomes. A sound grasp of, and clearly identifies, the purpose, goals, research questions or argument. Some wider study beyond the classroom content shown. Effectively describes and explains the central purpose, arguments, research questions, or goals of the project; explanation is focused, detailed and compelling. Recognition of alternative forms of evidence beyond that supplied in the classroom. Analytical / Critical Thinking Skills CRITICAL THINKING 30 % Research problems, concepts or ideas are not clearly articulated, or its component elements are not identified or described. Research information is poorly organized, categorized and/or not examined; research information is often inaccurate or incomplete. Presents little if any analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents few solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are often not well supported, are inaccurate and/or inconsistent, and are presented in a vague or rudimentary manner. Research problems, concepts or ideas are not clearly articulated at times and confusing. Research information is badly organized, categorized, and/or only superficially examined; research information is often incomplete. Presents limited analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents some solutions or conclusions but they are often not well supported, or logical. Adequately identifies and describes (or sketches out) the research problem, concept or idea and its components. Gathers and examines information relating to the research problem, concept, or idea; presents and appraises research information with some minor inconsistencies, irrelevancies, or omissions. Generally, applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories although with inaccuracies. Outlines solutions or conclusions that are somewhat logical and consistent with the analysis and evidence; identifies and/or lists solutions or conclusions although not always clearly. Formulates a clear description of the research problem, concept, or idea, and specifies major elements to be examined. Selects information appropriate to addressing the research problem, concept, or idea; accurately and appropriately analyses and interprets relevant research information. Effectively applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories in developing and justifying multiple solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are coherent, well supported, and complete. Effectively formulates a clear description of the research problem, concept, or idea, and specifies major elements to be examined. Selects and prioritizes information appropriate to addressing the research problem, concept, or idea; accurately and appropriately analyzes and interprets relevant research information. Precisely and effectively applies appropriate research methods, employs advanced skills to conduct research. Uses techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories in developing and justifying multiple solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are insightful, coherent, well supported, logically consistent and complete. Displays a mastery of complex and specialized areas. Integration Skills APPLICATION & EVALUATION 30 % Shows little ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to the research problem, concept, or idea. Does not recognize or correctly identify cross- functional organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept, or idea. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept, or idea considering relevant principles, theories, and practices across the business functional areas. Few if any solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, and/or they are not appropriately justified or supported. Shows some ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to research problems, concepts, or idea. Recognizes organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept or idea but does not show understanding. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept, or idea considering relevant principles, theories, and practices across the business functional areas. Some solutions offered but difficult to understand. Recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, but they are often not well supported, or logical. Exhibits application of principles, theories, and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept or idea. With some exceptions, outlines and describes (or sketches out) some cross- functional organizational issues that are relevant to the research problem, concept, or idea. Adequately identifies and describes (or summarizes) solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions that are, for the most part, appropriate, but which need to be more aligned with principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Demonstrates an ability to integrate and apply principles, theories, and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept, or idea. Identifies, examines, and critically evaluates important cross- functional organizational issues associated with the research problem, concept, or idea. Clearly justifies solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions based on analytics and an insightful synthesis of cross- disciplinary principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Demonstrates well- developed ability to integrate and apply principles, theories, and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept, or idea. Effectively identifies, examines, and critically evaluates important cross- functional organizational issues associated with the research problem, concept, or idea. Clearly and effectively justify solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions based on strong analytics and an insightful synthesis of cross- disciplinary principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Can link thinking across disciplines and contexts. Written Communication Skills COMMUNICATION Set 10% The written project exhibits multiple errors in grammar, sentence structure and/or spelling. Inadequate writing skills (e.g., weaknesses in language facility and mechanics) hinder readability and contribute to an ineffective research project. The written project exhibits errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The written project comes across as untidy and not properly checked for mistakes. Errors present in written communication make readability frustrating. Written research project displays good word choice, language conventions and mechanics with a few minor errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure and/or punctuation. Errors do not represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. The readability of the project is good due to the clarity of language used. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are without error. Spelling and grammar thoroughly checked. The readability of the project is enhanced by facility in language use/word choice. Excellent mechanics and syntactic variety. Uses language conventions effectively (e.g., spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, paragraphing, grammar, etc.).