New students: get 15% off your first order with code WELCOME15 Claim offer

admin 14 min read Psychology

[Solved] Introduction – Capstone project (empirical) or review type (review)

Please help with assignment - ## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx - ## webinformationwithvideo.docx - ## Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx - ## Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx - ## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc **## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx** NOTE FR...

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

Please help with assignment – ## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx – ## webinformationwithvideo.docx – ## Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx – ## Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx – ## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc **## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx** NOTE FROM INSTRUCTOR You want to make sure there are enough (E.g., at least 3…

Instant Solution Download

.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Please help with assignment – ## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx – ## webinformationwithvideo.docx – ## Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx – ## Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx – ## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc **## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx** NOTE FROM INSTRUCTOR You want to make sure there are enough (E.g., at least 30??) articles empirically examining this relationship (online mental health sessions/support and benefits to mental health) before selecting it. When doing your review, be sure to pay attention to the way you need to search for articles. You must follow an iterative approach, once you decide on your general topic. Eventually you will create a research question that the review article outcomes (aka "data") can answer. **## webinformationwithvideo.docx** **Please watch and read** 1. **Literature Review: Developing a search strategy** [https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies](https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies) 2. **Literature Review: Traditional or narrative literature reviews** [https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View](https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View) **## Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx** **Instructions** Empirical projects: Please upload your Introduction for your proposal to this drop box (empirical). I don't expect it to be complete! If you already have a method, you can upload them together as one document and I will provide feedback using the "Intro and Method" rubric. Note that people beginning new projects my not have anything to submit for several weeks. Review projects: Once you have read the literature review information, please complete [**THIS REVIEW TEMPLATE**](https://saintleo.brightspace.com/content/enforced/159640-co_PSY-690-MPOL1-2024SP1/protocol%20to%20guide%20your%20review%20-updated.doc) to help guide you in your review decisions. Then, please include the following in the template document and submit to "Introduction – Capstone (empirical) OR review type (review)" assignment folder (above). 1) your topic, including important variables. No do not need to formulate your question yet, but indicate the general area, such as effective treatments for schizophrenic patients, or communication styles between men and women, so I know what to expect; 2) document that you have looked at the literature and ensured there are enough peer-reviewed empirical articles published on the topic to warrant a review on the topic three references (minimum) you found from your search. Please provide search terms used to locate articles and a screen shot of your library search that shows the number of peer-reviewed articles relevant to the topic you've chosen located in your search; and 3) links to three articles you think look promising for your lit review project. **## Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx** **The purpose or aim of the literature review.** [**THIS VIDEO**](https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Traditional) does an excellent job explaining literature reviews and how to perform one. Start here! See below for a brief list of possible purposes of a literature review. A literature review, as part of a thesis or for any other publication, should demonstrate your knowledge of the research has been conducted in the past and should place your research in the context of this work. A thesis is an original and significant piece of work that adds to the body of knowledge in a particular field. A literature review can have a number of purposes within a thesis. These include: · demonstrating and clarify your understanding of your field of research; · identifying patterns and trends in the literature; · identifying gaps in the literature and seek new lines of inquiry; · identifying similarities and differences in previous research and place you work in perspective; · justifying your own research; · increasing your breadth of knowledge of your subject area; · identifying seminal and influential published works in your field; · identifying relevant journals, publishers and conferences to search; · providing the intellectual context for your own work, enabling you to position your project relative to other work; · identifying experts working in your field (a researcher network is a valuable resource); · carrying on from where others have already reached **THIS VIDEO** · **Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU&t=138s **## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc** **_Protocol template_** **Protocol Template: Literature Review** 1. **Background** I. Important characteristics What are the important population and/or characteristics (diagnostic criteria, minors -age/stage of development, adults on the Autism spectrum, etc.)? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ II. Relevance Does the review topic have important implications (individual and/or public), e. g. can be applied for education, health, business, etc.? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Rationale Does the evidence (including existing systematic reviews) fail to answer the review question, and why? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IV. Justification Is the need for the review justified in the light of the potential health or other implications and current limitations of the evidence base? What are the inclusion / exclusion criteria? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ Will you impose any additional limits, e.g. language, publication type, study design? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ How will study selection be performed (will you search and get a maximum number or articles and then pare them down, or will you search for specifics and add on? For the purposes of this project, you should use the former unless you have a god reason -talk to your instructor!)? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE 1 **## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc** **_Protocol template_** **Protocol Template: Literature Review** 1. **Background** I. Important characteristics What are the important population and/or characteristics (diagnostic criteria, minors -age/stage of development, adults on the Autism spectrum, etc.)? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ II. Relevance Does the review topic have important implications (individual and/or public), e. g. can be applied for education, health, business, etc.? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Rationale Does the evidence (including existing systematic reviews) fail to answer the review question, and why? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IV. Justification Is the need for the review justified in the light of the potential health or other implications and current limitations of the evidence base? What are the inclusion / exclusion criteria? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ Will you impose any additional limits, e.g. language, publication type, study design? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ How will study selection be performed (will you search and get a maximum number or articles and then pare them down, or will you search for specifics and add on? For the purposes of this project, you should use the former unless you have a god reason -talk to your instructor!)? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE 1 **## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx** NOTE FROM INSTRUCTOR You want to make sure there are enough (E.g., at least 30??) articles empirically examining this relationship (online mental health sessions/support and benefits to mental health) before selecting it. When doing your review, be sure to pay attention to the way you need to search for articles. You must follow an iterative approach, once you decide on your general topic. Eventually you will create a research question that the review article outcomes (aka "data") can answer. **## webinformationwithvideo.docx** **Please watch and read** 1. **Literature Review: Developing a search strategy** [https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies](https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies) 2. **Literature Review: Traditional or narrative literature reviews** [https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View](https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View) **## Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx** **Instructions** Empirical projects: Please upload your Introduction for your proposal to this drop box (empirical). I don't expect it to be complete! If you already have a method, you can upload them together as one document and I will provide feedback using the "Intro and Method" rubric. Note that people beginning new projects my not have anything to submit for several weeks. Review projects: Once you have read the literature review information, please complete [**THIS REVIEW TEMPLATE**](https://saintleo.brightspace.com/content/enforced/159640-co_PSY-690-MPOL1-2024SP1/protocol%20to%20guide%20your%20review%20-updated.doc) to help guide you in your review decisions. Then, please include the following in the template document and submit to "Introduction – Capstone (empirical) OR review type (review)" assignment folder (above). 1) your topic, including important variables. No do not need to formulate your question yet, but indicate the general area, such as effective treatments for schizophrenic patients, or communication styles between men and women, so I know what to expect; 2) document that you have looked at the literature and ensured there are enough peer-reviewed empirical articles published on the topic to warrant a review on the topic three references (minimum) you found from your search. Please provide search terms used to locate articles and a screen shot of your library search that shows the number of peer-reviewed articles relevant to the topic you've chosen located in your search; and 3) links to three articles you think look promising for your lit review project. **## Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx** **The purpose or aim of the literature review.** [**THIS VIDEO**](https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Traditional) does an excellent job explaining literature reviews and how to perform one. Start here! See below for a brief list of possible purposes of a literature review. A literature review, as part of a thesis or for any other publication, should demonstrate your knowledge of the research has been conducted in the past and should place your research in the context of this work. A thesis is an original and significant piece of work that adds to the body of knowledge in a particular field. A literature review can have a number of purposes within a thesis. These include: · demonstrating and clarify your understanding of your field of research; · identifying patterns and trends in the literature; · identifying gaps in the literature and seek new lines of inquiry; · identifying similarities and differences in previous research and place you work in perspective; · justifying your own research; · increasing your breadth of knowledge of your subject area; · identifying seminal and influential published works in your field; · identifying relevant journals, publishers and conferences to search; · providing the intellectual context for your own work, enabling you to position your project relative to other work; · identifying experts working in your field (a researcher network is a valuable resource); · carrying on from where others have already reached **THIS VIDEO** · **Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU&t=138s **## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc** **_Protocol template_** **Protocol Template: Literature Review** 1. **Background** I. Important characteristics What are the important population and/or characteristics (diagnostic criteria, minors -age/stage of development, adults on the Autism spectrum, etc.)? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ II. Relevance Does the review topic have important implications (individual and/or public), e. g. can be applied for education, health, business, etc.? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Rationale Does the evidence (including existing systematic reviews) fail to answer the review question, and why? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IV. Justification Is the need for the review justified in the light of the potential health or other implications and current limitations of the evidence base? What are the inclusion / exclusion criteria? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ Will you impose any additional limits, e.g. language, publication type, study design? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ How will study selection be performed (will you search and get a maximum number or articles and then pare them down, or will you search for specifics and add on? For the purposes of this project, you should use the former unless you have a god reason -talk to your instructor!)? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE 1 **## NOTEFROMINSTRUCTOR.docx** NOTE FROM INSTRUCTOR You want to make sure there are enough (E.g., at least 30??) articles empirically examining this relationship (online mental health sessions/support and benefits to mental health) before selecting it. When doing your review, be sure to pay attention to the way you need to search for articles. You must follow an iterative approach, once you decide on your general topic. Eventually you will create a research question that the review article outcomes (aka "data") can answer. **## webinformationwithvideo.docx** **Please watch and read** 1. **Literature Review: Developing a search strategy** [https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies](https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Search_Strategies) 2. **Literature Review: Traditional or narrative literature reviews** [https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View](https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/159640/viewContent/7106796/View) **## Introduction-Capstoneprojectempiricalorreviewtypereview.docx** **Instructions** Empirical projects: Please upload your Introduction for your proposal to this drop box (empirical). I don't expect it to be complete! If you already have a method, you can upload them together as one document and I will provide feedback using the "Intro and Method" rubric. Note that people beginning new projects my not have anything to submit for several weeks. Review projects: Once you have read the literature review information, please complete [**THIS REVIEW TEMPLATE**](https://saintleo.brightspace.com/content/enforced/159640-co_PSY-690-MPOL1-2024SP1/protocol%20to%20guide%20your%20review%20-updated.doc) to help guide you in your review decisions. Then, please include the following in the template document and submit to "Introduction – Capstone (empirical) OR review type (review)" assignment folder (above). 1) your topic, including important variables. No do not need to formulate your question yet, but indicate the general area, such as effective treatments for schizophrenic patients, or communication styles between men and women, so I know what to expect; 2) document that you have looked at the literature and ensured there are enough peer-reviewed empirical articles published on the topic to warrant a review on the topic three references (minimum) you found from your search. Please provide search terms used to locate articles and a screen shot of your library search that shows the number of peer-reviewed articles relevant to the topic you've chosen located in your search; and 3) links to three articles you think look promising for your lit review project. **## Neededinformationonreviewweek1.docx** **The purpose or aim of the literature review.** [**THIS VIDEO**](https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review/Traditional) does an excellent job explaining literature reviews and how to perform one. Start here! See below for a brief list of possible purposes of a literature review. A literature review, as part of a thesis or for any other publication, should demonstrate your knowledge of the research has been conducted in the past and should place your research in the context of this work. A thesis is an original and significant piece of work that adds to the body of knowledge in a particular field. A literature review can have a number of purposes within a thesis. These include: · demonstrating and clarify your understanding of your field of research; · identifying patterns and trends in the literature; · identifying gaps in the literature and seek new lines of inquiry; · identifying similarities and differences in previous research and place you work in perspective; · justifying your own research; · increasing your breadth of knowledge of your subject area; · identifying seminal and influential published works in your field; · identifying relevant journals, publishers and conferences to search; · providing the intellectual context for your own work, enabling you to position your project relative to other work; · identifying experts working in your field (a researcher network is a valuable resource); · carrying on from where others have already reached **THIS VIDEO** · **Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU&t=138s **## protocoltoguideyourreview-updated1.doc** **_Protocol template_** **Protocol Template: Literature Review** 1. **Background** I. Important characteristics What are the important population and/or characteristics (diagnostic criteria, minors -age/stage of development, adults on the Autism spectrum, etc.)? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ II. Relevance Does the review topic have important implications (individual and/or public), e. g. can be applied for education, health, business, etc.? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Rationale Does the evidence (including existing systematic reviews) fail to answer the review question, and why? \_\_\__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IV. Justification Is the need for the review justified in the light of the potential health or other implications and current limitations of the evidence base? What are the inclusion / exclusion criteria? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ Will you impose any additional limits, e.g. language, publication type, study design? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ How will study selection be performed (will you search and get a maximum number or articles and then pare them down, or will you search for specifics and add on? For the purposes of this project, you should use the former unless you have a god reason -talk to your instructor!)? \_\_\____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE 1 – 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5

Share:
Was this helpful?

Take the next step with this assignment

Every order includes a free originality report, unlimited revisions and 24/7 human support.

  • Subject expert matched to your exact course
  • Original work, written from scratch for you
  • On-time delivery, with free revisions
Purchase This Solution Order a Custom Written Paper

Secure checkout · Confidential service · No reselling

Join the discussion