[Solved] HR

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## FinalassignmentWedsmorning.pdf **## FinalassignmentWedsmorning.pdf** COURSE CODE BCOBM112 BCN18050 COURSE NAME Managing People and Organizations Task brief & rubrics Prof. Cristina Fernández INDIVIDUAL TASK. Please upload in word or pdf Formalities: • Wordcount: 1500-2000. • Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount. Please include charts/ graphics if relevant. • Font: Arial 12pts. • Text alignment: Justified. • The in-text References and the Bibliography must be in Harvard’s citation style. • Non-referenced definitions will be considered plagiarism. Submission: End of week 13, that is, the 21st of January at 23:59h Spanish time – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Weight: This task is 60% of your total grade for this subject. It assesses the following learning outcomes: • Outcome 1: Knowledge & Understanding & Application of the course content. • Outcome 2: Critical thinking and communication. TASK DESCRIPTION Please read the following documents: Article 1: https://jobs.netflix.com/culture Article 2: https://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-management-and-culture-presentation-2013-2#-14 Article 3: https://hbr.org/2014/01/how-netflix-reinvented-hr In 2013, Netflix published its “Culture doc”, created by HR Chief Patty McCord, CEO Reed Hastings, and others at the company. The document (article 1) is still evolving and is used by the company to this day. At the time it was considered “the most influential document to ever come out Silicon Valley” (article 2). It changed many things in the HR approach field. Questions to develop: 1) Identify what changes introduced the above-mentioned document and why. 2) What leadership style and organizational structure do Netflix have? Do further research if necessary. [https://jobs.netflix.com/culture](https://jobs.netflix.com/culture) [https://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-management-and-culture-presentation-2013-2%23-14](https://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-management-and-culture-presentation-2013-2%23-14) [https://hbr.org/2014/01/how-netflix-reinvented-hr](https://hbr.org/2014/01/how-netflix-reinvented-hr) 3) What are the components of corporate culture? Describe every component in detail and explain how every item is approached in Netflix (do further research if necessary). 4) Pay level. Define this concept. In the case of Netflix, is it under or above market? How was been defined the pay structure? Justify your answer. 5) Most of Netflix teams work remotely and worldwide. What HR policies will be influenced by that and how? 6) How can HR through its responsibilities (and functions) accompany the change the organization (Netflix) needs, also in the future? Rubrics Learning Descriptors Fail Below 60% Marginal Fail 60-69% Fair 70-79 % Good 80-89% Content KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING Set 30% Content is unclear, inaccurate and/or incomplete. Brief and irrelevant. Descriptive. Only personal views offered. Unsubstantiated and does not support the purpose, argument or goals of the project. Reader gains no insight through the content of the project. Limited content that does not really support the purpose of the report. Very poor coverage. Displays only rudimentary knowledge of the content area. Reader gains few if any insights Presents some information that adequately supports the central purpose, arguments, goals, or research questions of the project. Although parts missing, it demonstrates a level of partially proficient knowledge of the content area. Reader gains some insights. Presents clear and appropriate information that adequately supports the central purpose, arguments, goals or research questions of the project. Demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of the content area. Reader gains proficient insights. Analytical / Critical Thinking Skills CRITICAL THINKING 20 % Research problem, concept or idea is not clearly articulated, or its component elements are not identified or described. Research information is poorly organized, categorized and/or not examined; research information is often inaccurate or incomplete. Presents little if any analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents few solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are often not well supported, are inaccurate and/or inconsistent, and are presented in a vague or rudimentary manner. Research problem, concept or idea is not clearly articulated at times and confusing. Research information is badly organized, categorized, and/or only superficially examined; research information is often incomplete. Presents limited analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents some solutions or conclusions but they are often not well supported, or logical. Adequately identifies and describes (or sketches out) the research problem, concept or idea and its components. Gathers and examines information relating to the research problem, concept or idea; presents and appraises research information with some minor inconsistencies, irrelevancies or omissions. Generally applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories although with inaccuracies. Outlines solutions or conclusions that are somewhat logical and consistent with the analysis and evidence; identifies and/or lists solutions or conclusions although not always clearly. Formulates a clear description of the research problem, concept or idea, and specifies major elements to be examined. Selects information appropriate to addressing the research problem, concept or idea; accurately and appropriately analyses and interprets relevant research information. Effectively applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories in developing and justifying multiple solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are coherent, well supported and complete. Integration Skills APPLICATION & EVALUATION Shows little ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to the research problem, concept, Shows some ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to the research problem, concept or Exhibits application of principles, theories and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept or idea. With Demonstrates an ability to integrate and apply principles, theories and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept or idea. 3 30 % or idea. Does not recognize or correctly identify cross-functional organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept or idea. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept or idea in light of relevant principles, theories and practices across the business functional areas. Few if any solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, and/or they are not appropriately justified or supported. idea. Recognizes organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept or idea but does not show understanding. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept or idea in light of relevant principles, theories and practices across the business functional areas. Some solutions offered but difficult to understand. Recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, but they are often not well supported, or logical. some exceptions, outlines and describes (or sketches out) some cross- functional organizational issues that are relevant to the research problem, concept or idea. Adequately identifies and describes (or summarizes) solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions that are, for the most part, appropriate, but which need to be more aligned with principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Identifies, examines and critically evaluates important cross- functional organizational issues associated with the research problem, concept or idea. Clearly justifies solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions based on analytics and an insightful synthesis of cross-disciplinary principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Use of References COMMUNICATION Set 20% Little or no evidence of reference sources in the report. Content not supported and based on unsubstantiated views. Most references are from sources that are not peer- reviewed or professional, and have uncertain reliability. Few if any appropriate citations are provided. Reader doubts the validity of much of the material. Professionally legitimate references are generally used. Fair citations are presented in most cases. Some of the information/content/evidence comes from sources that are reliable, but more academic sources needed to be convincing. Professionally and academically legitimate references are used. Clear and accurate citations are presented in most cases. The majority of the information/content/evidence comes from sources that are reliable. **## FinalassignmentWedsmorning.pdf** COURSE CODE BCOBM112 BCN18050 COURSE NAME Managing People and Organizations Task brief & rubrics Prof. Cristina Fernández INDIVIDUAL TASK. Please upload in word or pdf Formalities: • Wordcount: 1500-2000. • Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount. Please include charts/ graphics if relevant. • Font: Arial 12pts. • Text alignment: Justified. • The in-text References and the Bibliography must be in Harvard’s citation style. • Non-referenced definitions will be considered plagiarism. Submission: End of week 13, that is, the 21st of January at 23:59h Spanish time – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Weight: This task is 60% of your total grade for this subject. It assesses the following learning outcomes: • Outcome 1: Knowledge & Understanding & Application of the course content. • Outcome 2: Critical thinking and communication. TASK DESCRIPTION Please read the following documents: Article 1: https://jobs.netflix.com/culture Article 2: https://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-management-and-culture-presentation-2013-2#-14 Article 3: https://hbr.org/2014/01/how-netflix-reinvented-hr In 2013, Netflix published its “Culture doc”, created by HR Chief Patty McCord, CEO Reed Hastings, and others at the company. The document (article 1) is still evolving and is used by the company to this day. At the time it was considered “the most influential document to ever come out Silicon Valley” (article 2). It changed many things in the HR approach field. Questions to develop: 1) Identify what changes introduced the above-mentioned document and why. 2) What leadership style and organizational structure do Netflix have? Do further research if necessary. [https://jobs.netflix.com/culture](https://jobs.netflix.com/culture) [https://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-management-and-culture-presentation-2013-2%23-14](https://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-management-and-culture-presentation-2013-2%23-14) [https://hbr.org/2014/01/how-netflix-reinvented-hr](https://hbr.org/2014/01/how-netflix-reinvented-hr) 3) What are the components of corporate culture? Describe every component in detail and explain how every item is approached in Netflix (do further research if necessary). 4) Pay level. Define this concept. In the case of Netflix, is it under or above market? How was been defined the pay structure? Justify your answer. 5) Most of Netflix teams work remotely and worldwide. What HR policies will be influenced by that and how? 6) How can HR through its responsibilities (and functions) accompany the change the organization (Netflix) needs, also in the future? Rubrics Learning Descriptors Fail Below 60% Marginal Fail 60-69% Fair 70-79 % Good 80-89% Content KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING Set 30% Content is unclear, inaccurate and/or incomplete. Brief and irrelevant. Descriptive. Only personal views offered. Unsubstantiated and does not support the purpose, argument or goals of the project. Reader gains no insight through the content of the project. Limited content that does not really support the purpose of the report. Very poor coverage. Displays only rudimentary knowledge of the content area. Reader gains few if any insights Presents some information that adequately supports the central purpose, arguments, goals, or research questions of the project. Although parts missing, it demonstrates a level of partially proficient knowledge of the content area. Reader gains some insights. Presents clear and appropriate information that adequately supports the central purpose, arguments, goals or research questions of the project. Demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of the content area. Reader gains proficient insights. Analytical / Critical Thinking Skills CRITICAL THINKING 20 % Research problem, concept or idea is not clearly articulated, or its component elements are not identified or described. Research information is poorly organized, categorized and/or not examined; research information is often inaccurate or incomplete. Presents little if any analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents few solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are often not well supported, are inaccurate and/or inconsistent, and are presented in a vague or rudimentary manner. Research problem, concept or idea is not clearly articulated at times and confusing. Research information is badly organized, categorized, and/or only superficially examined; research information is often incomplete. Presents limited analysis or interpretation; inaccurately and/or inappropriately applies research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories to the analysis. Presents some solutions or conclusions but they are often not well supported, or logical. Adequately identifies and describes (or sketches out) the research problem, concept or idea and its components. Gathers and examines information relating to the research problem, concept or idea; presents and appraises research information with some minor inconsistencies, irrelevancies or omissions. Generally applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories although with inaccuracies. Outlines solutions or conclusions that are somewhat logical and consistent with the analysis and evidence; identifies and/or lists solutions or conclusions although not always clearly. Formulates a clear description of the research problem, concept or idea, and specifies major elements to be examined. Selects information appropriate to addressing the research problem, concept or idea; accurately and appropriately analyses and interprets relevant research information. Effectively applies appropriate research methods, techniques, models, frameworks and/or theories in developing and justifying multiple solutions or conclusions; solutions or conclusions are coherent, well supported and complete. Integration Skills APPLICATION & EVALUATION Shows little ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to the research problem, concept, Shows some ability to employ theory and practice across the functional areas of business in the assessment of issues relating to the research problem, concept or Exhibits application of principles, theories and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept or idea. With Demonstrates an ability to integrate and apply principles, theories and practices across the functional areas of business to the analysis of the research problem, concept or idea. 3 30 % or idea. Does not recognize or correctly identify cross-functional organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept or idea. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept or idea in light of relevant principles, theories and practices across the business functional areas. Few if any solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, and/or they are not appropriately justified or supported. idea. Recognizes organizational issues relevant to the research problem, concept or idea but does not show understanding. Does not adequately evaluate the research problem, concept or idea in light of relevant principles, theories and practices across the business functional areas. Some solutions offered but difficult to understand. Recommendations for action, or conclusions are presented, but they are often not well supported, or logical. some exceptions, outlines and describes (or sketches out) some cross- functional organizational issues that are relevant to the research problem, concept or idea. Adequately identifies and describes (or summarizes) solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions that are, for the most part, appropriate, but which need to be more aligned with principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Identifies, examines and critically evaluates important cross- functional organizational issues associated with the research problem, concept or idea. Clearly justifies solutions, recommendations for action, or conclusions based on analytics and an insightful synthesis of cross-disciplinary principles and concepts in the functional areas of business. Use of References COMMUNICATION Set 20% Little or no evidence of reference sources in the report. Content not supported and based on unsubstantiated views. Most references are from sources that are not peer- reviewed or professional, and have uncertain reliability. Few if any appropriate citations are provided. Reader doubts the validity of much of the material. Professionally legitimate references are generally used. Fair citations are presented in most cases. Some of the information/content/evidence comes from sources that are reliable, but more academic sources needed to be convincing. Professionally and academically legitimate references are used. Clear and accurate citations are presented in most cases. The majority of the information/content/evidence comes from sources that are reliable.