Executive Solution Overview
Attached – ## Paper1Rubric13.docx **## Paper1Rubric13.docx** **Paper 1 Rubric:** · Click on the available link below to view the documentary on YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI) Note: This documentary is nearly 2 hours in duration. Please find time to view it in its entirety (which y…
Instant Solution Download
.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Attached – ## Paper1Rubric13.docx **## Paper1Rubric13.docx** **Paper 1 Rubric:** · Click on the available link below to view the documentary on YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI) Note: This documentary is nearly 2 hours in duration. Please find time to view it in its entirety (which you may wish to break up into segments.) · Turn in via CANVAS as Microsoft Word (or apache OpenOffice) document (double spaced) · **Must be at least 300 words in length** · Must have the following included in the paper: · 1) Summary of the documentary. · 2) Your opinion of whether documentary is discussing the topic in a sound scientific way or in a pseudo-scientific way and why you think this. · 3) What appear to be the strongest arguments for both “evolution” and for “intelligent design”? · 3) A short discussion of at least one way the article/video could have been improved (saying “this article/video is great the way it is and needs no improvement” does NOT count) · **Note that there is no citation requirement** **## Paper1Rubric13.docx** **Paper 1 Rubric:** · Click on the available link below to view the documentary on YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI) Note: This documentary is nearly 2 hours in duration. Please find time to view it in its entirety (which you may wish to break up into segments.) · Turn in via CANVAS as Microsoft Word (or apache OpenOffice) document (double spaced) · **Must be at least 300 words in length** · Must have the following included in the paper: · 1) Summary of the documentary. · 2) Your opinion of whether documentary is discussing the topic in a sound scientific way or in a pseudo-scientific way and why you think this. · 3) What appear to be the strongest arguments for both “evolution” and for “intelligent design”? · 3) A short discussion of at least one way the article/video could have been improved (saying “this article/video is great the way it is and needs no improvement” does NOT count) · **Note that there is no citation requirement**