[Solved] global conflict

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## FinalGCU.docx **## FinalGCU.docx** Choose a current conflict in the world where the United States is involved because of its foreign policy. In 1,000-1,250 words, describe the following: 1. Explain the role of the legislative branch while involved in this conflict. Should the legislative branch be more or less involved than it has been? 2. Explain the role of the executive branch while involved in this conflict. Should the executive branch be more or less involved than it has been? 3. Describe how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict. Have these organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to this conflict? How important is it that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in situations similar to this. Use three to five scholarly resources to support your explanations. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. **Rubric Criteria** Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All **Role of Legislative Branch** 18 points **Criteria Description** Explain the role of the legislative branch while involved in this conflict. Should the legislative branch be more or less involved than it has been? **5. Target** 18 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research. **4. Acceptable** 15.66 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present, clear, and makes some connection to research. **3. Approaching** 14.22 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present. **2. Insufficient** 13.32 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is vague and inconsistent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is missing. **Role of Executive Branch** 18 points **Criteria Description** Explain the role of the executive branch while involved in this conflict. Should the executive branch be more or less involved than it has been? **5. Target** 18 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research. **4. Acceptable** 15.66 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present, clear, and makes some connection to research. **3. Approaching** 14.22 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present. **2. Insufficient** 13.32 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is vague and inconsistent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is missing. **United Nations** 27 points **Criteria Description** Describe how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict. Include how these organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to this conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in situations similar to this. **5. Target** 27 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are clear, concise, and makes connections to current research. **4. Acceptable** 23.49 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are present, clear, and makes some connection to research. **3. Approaching** 21.33 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are present. **2. Insufficient** 19.98 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are vague and inconsistent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are missing. **Thesis Development** 6.3 points **Criteria Description** Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. **5. Target** 6.3 points The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience. **4. Acceptable** 5.48 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. **3. Approaching** 4.98 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. **2. Insufficient** 4.66 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. **Development, Structure, and Conclusion** 7.2 points **Criteria Description** Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. **5. Target** 7.2 points The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. **4. Acceptable** 6.26 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. **3. Approaching** 5.69 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. **2. Insufficient** 5.33 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. **Evidence** 4.5 points **Criteria Description** Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. **5. Target** 4.5 points Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively. **4. Acceptable** 3.92 points Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated. **3. Approaching** 3.56 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. **2. Insufficient** 3.33 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. **Mechanics of Writing** 4.5 points **Criteria Description** Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. **5. Target** 4.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. **4. Acceptable** 3.92 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. **3. Approaching** 3.56 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. **2. Insufficient** 3.33 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. **Format/Documentation** 4.5 points **Criteria Description** Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. **5. Target** 4.5 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. **4. Acceptable** 3.92 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. **3. Approaching** 3.56 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. **2. Insufficient** 3.33 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. **## FinalGCU.docx** Choose a current conflict in the world where the United States is involved because of its foreign policy. In 1,000-1,250 words, describe the following: 1. Explain the role of the legislative branch while involved in this conflict. Should the legislative branch be more or less involved than it has been? 2. Explain the role of the executive branch while involved in this conflict. Should the executive branch be more or less involved than it has been? 3. Describe how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict. Have these organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to this conflict? How important is it that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in situations similar to this. Use three to five scholarly resources to support your explanations. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. **Rubric Criteria** Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All **Role of Legislative Branch** 18 points **Criteria Description** Explain the role of the legislative branch while involved in this conflict. Should the legislative branch be more or less involved than it has been? **5. Target** 18 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research. **4. Acceptable** 15.66 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present, clear, and makes some connection to research. **3. Approaching** 14.22 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present. **2. Insufficient** 13.32 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is vague and inconsistent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Explanation of the role of the legislative branch while involved in the conflict, including if the legislative branch should be more or less involved than it has been is missing. **Role of Executive Branch** 18 points **Criteria Description** Explain the role of the executive branch while involved in this conflict. Should the executive branch be more or less involved than it has been? **5. Target** 18 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research. **4. Acceptable** 15.66 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present, clear, and makes some connection to research. **3. Approaching** 14.22 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is present. **2. Insufficient** 13.32 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is vague and inconsistent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Explanation of the role of the executive branch while involved in the conflict, including if the executive branch should be more or less involved than it has been is missing. **United Nations** 27 points **Criteria Description** Describe how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict. Include how these organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to this conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in situations similar to this. **5. Target** 27 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are clear, concise, and makes connections to current research. **4. Acceptable** 23.49 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are present, clear, and makes some connection to research. **3. Approaching** 21.33 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are present. **2. Insufficient** 19.98 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are vague and inconsistent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Description of how involved the United Nations and other international organizations have been in the conflict, including how the organizations influenced the United States foreign or defense policy in relation to the conflict and how important it is that the United Nations and other international organizations are involved in similar situations are missing. **Thesis Development** 6.3 points **Criteria Description** Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. **5. Target** 6.3 points The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience. **4. Acceptable** 5.48 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. **3. Approaching** 4.98 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. **2. Insufficient** 4.66 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. **Development, Structure, and Conclusion** 7.2 points **Criteria Description** Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. **5. Target** 7.2 points The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. **4. Acceptable** 6.26 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. **3. Approaching** 5.69 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. **2. Insufficient** 5.33 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. **Evidence** 4.5 points **Criteria Description** Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. **5. Target** 4.5 points Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively. **4. Acceptable** 3.92 points Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated. **3. Approaching** 3.56 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. **2. Insufficient** 3.33 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. **Mechanics of Writing** 4.5 points **Criteria Description** Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. **5. Target** 4.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. **4. Acceptable** 3.92 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. **3. Approaching** 3.56 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. **2. Insufficient** 3.33 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. **Format/Documentation** 4.5 points **Criteria Description** Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. **5. Target** 4.5 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. **4. Acceptable** 3.92 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. **3. Approaching** 3.56 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. **2. Insufficient** 3.33 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. **1. Unsatisfactory** 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.