[Solved] #1

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

follow the instructions – ## Assign1Rubric.doc **## Assign1Rubric.doc** | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **Assignment #1: The Future of People Management Priorities. (15% of class mark)** | **Student Name & ID#** | | **Awarded** | **Possible 100%** | | | | **Explain why HRM is important in the global environment and who is responsible for HRM in an organization (20)** | Exceptionally well-presented. The organizational elements are clearly described.<br>Clear evidence that the article “The Future of People Management Priorities” referred to. Elements are supported by references from the article. (20) | Most of the content is presented and described adequately. Some elements may lack coherence or details necessary for further analysis. Some references for content may be missing.<br>(15) | The content is partially presented and not well described.<br>Elements are missing and not supported by sources. (12) | Content is not sound. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced<br>**.**(10) | | | **Explain why HRM is one of the most critical management functions in an organization. (20)** | Include a minimum of 3 well written reasons why HRM is critical in an organization and must align with the strategic objectives of the organization.<br>Clear evidence that the article referred to. (20) | Included two reasons HR critical. Methods mostly align with the organization.<br>Statements are moderately well written with room for improvement. Demonstrated average level of understanding of course material. (15) | The two job HR reasons demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the link between the organization and HR. <br>The understanding of the article is less than expectations. (10) | The paper includes poorly written reasoning or less than two.<br>Not well linked to the strategy of the organization. (7.5) | | | **Explain how priorities in HR have changed over time. (20)** | Provides a minimum of 3 reasons why HR priorities have changed over time. Exceptionally well-presented and described. Clear evidence that the article is referred to. (20) | Provides 2 reasons why HR priorities have changed over time. Most of the content is presented and described adequately. Some elements may lack coherence or details.<br>Some references for content may be missing. (15) | The content is partially presented and not well described.<br>Elements are missing and not supported by sources. (10) | Content is not sound. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced<br>**.**(7.5) | | | **Explains the future of HR and the critical priorities requiring action (20)** | Provides a minimum of 3 critical future HR priorities requiring action. Exceptionally well-presented and described. Clear evidence that the article is referred to. (20) | Provides 2 reasons why HR priorities have changed over time. Most of the content is presented and described adequately. Some elements may lack coherence or details.<br>Some references for content may be missing. (15) | The content is partially presented and not well described.<br>Elements are missing and not supported by sources. (10) | Content is not sound. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced<br>**.**(7.5) | | | **Quality of writing, formatting, & referencing (20)** | Excellent grammar, spelling and punctuation. The writing was clear and logical. Excellent use of sources cited as per APA style.<br>Length of paper reasonable.<br>(20) | A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, or punctuation, and citations, but not many. Some sources not cited. Length of paper too short or too long (15) | Shows pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, or punctuation and citations. Demonstrated lack of proof reading. Many sources not cited. Length of paper too short or too long. (10) | Continuous spelling, grammar, syntax, or punctuation errors. Unprofessional. Length of paper not acceptable. Rare citation of original source.(5) | | | 100 | | | | | **## Assign1Rubric.doc** | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | **Assignment #1: The Future of People Management Priorities. (15% of class mark)** | **Student Name & ID#** | | **Awarded** | **Possible 100%** | | | | **Explain why HRM is important in the global environment and who is responsible for HRM in an organization (20)** | Exceptionally well-presented. The organizational elements are clearly described.<br>Clear evidence that the article “The Future of People Management Priorities” referred to. Elements are supported by references from the article. (20) | Most of the content is presented and described adequately. Some elements may lack coherence or details necessary for further analysis. Some references for content may be missing.<br>(15) | The content is partially presented and not well described.<br>Elements are missing and not supported by sources. (12) | Content is not sound. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced<br>**.**(10) | | | **Explain why HRM is one of the most critical management functions in an organization. (20)** | Include a minimum of 3 well written reasons why HRM is critical in an organization and must align with the strategic objectives of the organization.<br>Clear evidence that the article referred to. (20) | Included two reasons HR critical. Methods mostly align with the organization.<br>Statements are moderately well written with room for improvement. Demonstrated average level of understanding of course material. (15) | The two job HR reasons demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the link between the organization and HR. <br>The understanding of the article is less than expectations. (10) | The paper includes poorly written reasoning or less than two.<br>Not well linked to the strategy of the organization. (7.5) | | | **Explain how priorities in HR have changed over time. (20)** | Provides a minimum of 3 reasons why HR priorities have changed over time. Exceptionally well-presented and described. Clear evidence that the article is referred to. (20) | Provides 2 reasons why HR priorities have changed over time. Most of the content is presented and described adequately. Some elements may lack coherence or details.<br>Some references for content may be missing. (15) | The content is partially presented and not well described.<br>Elements are missing and not supported by sources. (10) | Content is not sound. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced<br>**.**(7.5) | | | **Explains the future of HR and the critical priorities requiring action (20)** | Provides a minimum of 3 critical future HR priorities requiring action. Exceptionally well-presented and described. Clear evidence that the article is referred to. (20) | Provides 2 reasons why HR priorities have changed over time. Most of the content is presented and described adequately. Some elements may lack coherence or details.<br>Some references for content may be missing. (15) | The content is partially presented and not well described.<br>Elements are missing and not supported by sources. (10) | Content is not sound. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced<br>**.**(7.5) | | | **Quality of writing, formatting, & referencing (20)** | Excellent grammar, spelling and punctuation. The writing was clear and logical. Excellent use of sources cited as per APA style.<br>Length of paper reasonable.<br>(20) | A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, or punctuation, and citations, but not many. Some sources not cited. Length of paper too short or too long (15) | Shows pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, or punctuation and citations. Demonstrated lack of proof reading. Many sources not cited. Length of paper too short or too long. (10) | Continuous spelling, grammar, syntax, or punctuation errors. Unprofessional. Length of paper not acceptable. Rare citation of original source.(5) | | | 100 | | | | |